| [10:03] <pitti> cpaelzer: \o/ thanks for merging https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/merge_requests/140 | |
| [10:03] <ubottu> Merge 140 in libvirt/libvirt "apparmor: Fix QEMU access for UEFI variable files" [Closed] | |
| [10:03] <pitti> cpaelzer: I'll backport the fix and send it to Debian; I can upload it to jammy as well if you want me | |
| [10:13] <seb128> pitti, hey! how are you? :-) | |
| [10:13] <pitti> bonjour seb128 ! je vais très bien, merci ! trying to fix some AppArmor issue in Debian/Ubuntu 😀 | |
| [10:14] <seb128> pitti, I think I saw you on screen monday :) | |
| [10:14] <pitti> et toi ! comment est la terre de desktop ? | |
| [10:15] <seb128> pitti, ça va bien merci! we had our first engineering sprint in 2 years, was nice to see people in real again! | |
| [10:21] <pitti> seb128: right, I saw that on twitter or telegram or so 🍻 nice! | |
| [10:21] <seb128> :) | |
| [10:22] <seb128> pitti, small world, I didn't know you had a team member in Delft! | |
| [10:22] <pitti> seb128: yes, Jelle, since last August | |
| [10:22] <pitti> seb128: ah, that's what you meant with "screen"! | |
| [10:22] <seb128> pitti, he started coming to the coworking I'm going to on mondays | |
| [10:23] <seb128> pitti, right :) | |
| [10:25] <cpaelzer> pitti: yes if you prep it for Debian anyway it is the same structure for d/p/* | |
| [10:32] <pitti> cpaelzer: yep, will send a salsa MP and then upload to jammy | |
| [10:32] <pitti> (and test the backport, of course) | |
| [11:25] <jbicha> pitti: hi, could you take a look at Debian bug 1006465 ? | |
| [11:25] <ubottu> Debian bug 1006465 in src:python-dbusmock "python-dbusmock: Fails to build from source: README.rst is not README.md" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1006465 | |
| [11:27] <jbicha> the gnome-bluetooth maintainer is using bleeding edge python-dbusmock features, lol | |
| [11:48] <pitti> jbicha: oops! will do, sure; weird, why didn't I get an email about that | |
| [12:04] <pitti> jbicha: uploaded, I'll sync it to jammy tomorrow; thanks for pointing out! | |
| [12:04] <pitti> (and I subscribed to the PTS now, another "oops") | |
| [12:39] <schopin> I have a universe package that apparently has big-endian support broken upstream for 7 years without anyone raising the issue. The current version in the release pocket predates the breakage, but the one in -proposed is much more recent. | |
| [12:41] <schopin> I'd like to remove the s390x build for this package as I figure that if a compilation failure went undetected for so long, there's probably other problems down the road. Anyone think it's a bad idea? | |
| [12:43] <schopin> the package in question is virtuoso-opensource, which is a database. Endianness shenanigans could easily mess up the on-disk format | |
| [13:03] <ginggs> schopin: if the s390x binaries were already removed in debian, it makes sense for them just to be removed in ubuntu too | |
| [13:04] <ginggs> same for armhf | |
| [13:04] <schopin> Yeah armhf was going out for sure, upstream explicitly doesn't support 32bit | |
| [13:04] <ginggs> schopin: see recent discussion in #ubuntu-release re: open3d | |
| [13:05] <schopin> Allright, works for me. Thanks! | |
| [13:12] <ginggs> schopin: see debian bug #982800 | |
| [13:12] <ubottu> Debian bug 982800 in ftp.debian.org "RM: virtuoso-opensource [armel armhf i386 mipsel s390x] -- RoQA; upstream no longer supports 32bit or big endian" [Normal, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/982800 | |
| [13:14] <ginggs> you can refer to that in the ubuntu bug | |
| [13:26] <didrocks> ahasenack: hey, FYI, I was able to reproduce seldomly the flaky tests on arm64. I did give it a try and I think https://github.com/ubuntu/adsys/pull/297 addresses it. I couldn’t get it after dividing in phases, so crossing fingers :) I’ll upload once I get a review | |
| [13:26] <ubottu> Pull 297 in ubuntu/adsys "Try fixing flaky 'pick up config changes' tests" [Open] | |
| [13:27] <ahasenack> didrocks: you used one of those arm64 boxes? | |
| [13:28] <ahasenack> hah, I see a Sleep() :) | |
| [13:28] <ahasenack> can't be avoided :) | |
| [13:28] <schopin> ginggs: if we get the binaries removed from the archive, should I introduce a delta to explicitly remove them from the package? I'll forward a patch to Debian nonetheless. | |
| [13:28] <didrocks> ahasenack: yeah, I did use one, thanks for getting me access to it! Yeah, there is a sleep, but still different phases which avoids getting wrong amount of callbacks… | |
| [13:29] <didrocks> so a little bit less elegant than the initial test architecture, but unavoidable I guess… | |
| [13:29] <ahasenack> I'm far from judging :) | |
| [13:43] <ginggs> schopin: no, no need to explicitly remove them from the package | |
| [15:00] <pitti> cpaelzer: since I'm a little rusty: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/589804887/libvirt_8.0.0-1ubuntu4_8.0.0-1ubuntu5.diff.gz | |
| [15:00] <pitti> cpaelzer: just tested (and reported on the bug), works fine | |
| [15:21] <cpaelzer> pitti: busy with calls for the rest of the day, but I've opened a window and can try to test more before sponsoring tomorrow | |
| [15:21] <pitti> cpaelzer: ah, I felt lucky and uploaded already | |
| [15:21] <pitti> happy to do a follow-up of course if something doesn't look right | |
| [15:22] <pitti> (it was mostly about the "quilt refresh" noise, the rest is straightforward) | |
| [15:22] <pitti> reverse dep autopkgtests should do the rest | |
| [15:22] <pitti> (and of course I tested the build) | |
| [15:22] <cpaelzer> fine with me pitti | |
| [19:20] <philroche> xypron: RE "Do you know who is responsible for creating the minimal Ubuntu images for Dockerhub? buildkit received RISC-V support last year." yes this is my team. I will see if there is any work ongoing on that front | |
| [19:28] <philroche> xypron: Nothing planned as of yet. | |
| [20:58] <sarnold> paride: awesome memory on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1930921/comments/5 :) that's an excellent suggestion | |
| [20:58] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1930921 in samba (Ubuntu) "Apache 2.4.41 corrupts files from samba share" [Undecided, Confirmed] | |
| [21:54] <xypron> philroche: There actually is already a riscv64 image on Dockerhub: https://hub.docker.com/_/ubuntu Works nice with our docker.io on riscv64 now. | |
| [22:47] <Eickmeyer> mapreri: I confirmed bug 1964390, is this something you're at least peripherally aware of? | |
| [22:47] <ubottu> Bug 1964390 in inkscape (Ubuntu) "Inkscape will not launch on Ubuntu 22.04" [Undecided, Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1964390 | |