| [00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pagmo [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.18.0-1] (no packageset) | |
| [00:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pagmo [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.18.0-1] (no packageset) | |
| [00:26] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: ta re: libfm-qt, ran into it locally so fixed :) | |
| [00:26] <tsimonq2> (I don't feel like opening my phone to get to Telegram :D) | |
| [01:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python3.11 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.11.0~b3-1] (no packageset) | |
| [01:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python3.11 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.11.0~b3-1] (no packageset) | |
| [02:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python3.11 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [3.11.0~b3-1] (no packageset) | |
| [02:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop-python [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.04.1-1] (kubuntu) | |
| [02:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop-python [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.04.1-1] (kubuntu) | |
| [02:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-prodigy [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset) | |
| [02:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop-python [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.04.1-1] (kubuntu) | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop-python [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1] | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-prodigy [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.0.0-1] | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop-python [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1] | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop-python [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1] | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pagmo [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [2.18.0-1] | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.11 [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [3.11.0~b3-1] | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop-python [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.04.1-1] (kubuntu) | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pagmo [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [2.18.0-1] | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.11 [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [3.11.0~b3-1] | |
| [02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3.11 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [3.11.0~b3-1] | |
| [02:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop-python [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [22.04.1-1] | |
| [05:07] <tsimonq2> When is Feature Freeze for Kinetic? | |
| [05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shadow (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.2 => 1:4.8.1-1ubuntu5.20.04.3] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [05:08] <tsimonq2> Found it: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/kinetic-kudu-release-schedule/27263 | |
| [05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adduser (focal-proposed/main) [3.118ubuntu2 => 3.118ubuntu2.1] (core) | |
| [06:23] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, luajit is now fine, on ppc64el its now provided by luajit2, with a better ppc64el and s390x backend :D | |
| [11:34] <coreycb> vorlon: thanks for checking. yes, the timing of our removal was right about when someone signed on to revive the project. | |
| [12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core Pi arm64 stable [Ubuntu Core 22 GA] (20220609.2) has been added | |
| [12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core Pi armhf stable [Ubuntu Core 22 GA] (20220609.2) has been added | |
| [12:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core amd64 stable [Ubuntu Core 22 GA] (20220609.2) has been added | |
| [13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0.2-0ubuntu1.3 => 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.4] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1.36.6-0ubuntu1 => 1.36.6-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [13:40] <seb128> could a SRU team member try to review ^ ? it's to fix a regression from the previous SRU which is in updates | |
| [13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (jammy-proposed/main) [1:7.3.3-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 => 1:7.3.4-0ubuntu0.22.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop) | |
| [13:45] <xnox> python3.10 builds on some arches failed without build logs; restarted | |
| [13:46] <xnox> python3-stdlib-extensions is uninstallable due to too high min-version of python3 meta, lowered it to the ubuntu setting and uploaded to make it installable | |
| [13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core Pi arm64 dangerous-stable [Ubuntu Core 22 GA] (20220609.3) has been added | |
| [13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core Pi armhf dangerous-stable [Ubuntu Core 22 GA] (20220609.3) has been added | |
| [13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Core amd64 dangerous-stable [Ubuntu Core 22 GA] (20220609.3) has been added | |
| [14:01] <ricotz> bdmurray, hello :), in case you have time, please take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1977525 | |
| [14:01] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1977525 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Jammy) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.3.4 for jammy" [High, In Progress] | |
| [14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openssl (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0.2-0ubuntu1.3 => 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.4] (core, i386-whitelist) | |
| [14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected openssl [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.0.2-0ubuntu1.4] | |
| [14:06] <ahasenack> hi ubuntu-archive, samba is now building the ldb binary packages previously built by src:ldb, since https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/2:4.16.1+dfsg-8ubuntu1 | |
| [14:06] <ahasenack> src:ldb was removed from debian already due to the same reason: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1319663/ldb-removed-from-testing/ (well, the reason isn't stated there) | |
| [14:07] <ahasenack> could we pelase remove src:ldb from kinetic? | |
| [14:08] <ahasenack> the actual change happened in 2:4.16.0+dfsg-1 | |
| [14:09] <ahasenack> https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/samba/2:4.16.0+dfsg-1 | |
| [14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.0.2-0ubuntu1.4] | |
| [14:29] * mdeslaur dances at ldb going away | |
| [14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (jammy-proposed/main) [3.104ubuntu9 => 3.104ubuntu10~22.04.1] (core) | |
| [14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (jammy-proposed) [3.104ubuntu10~22.04.1] | |
| [14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (jammy-proposed) [181.1] | |
| [14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: fastnetmon (jammy-proposed/primary) [1.2.1-1~ubuntu22.04.1] | |
| [15:02] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: does that mean no luajit removals needed? | |
| [15:04] <ahasenack> mdeslaur: actually, it just means that ldb-only security updates mean a new src:samba upload. But I think so far these have always been together (ldb security issue with samba security issue) | |
| [15:05] <mdeslaur> ahasenack: it's always a PITA to update lda when doing samba security updates, as I have to split out the patches, etc. | |
| [15:05] <mdeslaur> s/lda/ldb/ | |
| [15:06] <mdeslaur> ahasenack: having them all be in the samba source package definitely make it easier for me | |
| [15:06] <ahasenack> oh, good | |
| [15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted neutron-fwaas [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:16.0.0+git2022060611.b7be99c14-0ubuntu1] | |
| [15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: neutron-fwaas [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1:16.0.0+git2022060611.b7be99c14-0ubuntu1] (openstack) | |
| [15:31] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, no action needed :) | |
| [15:31] <LocutusOfBorg> on ppc64el the luajit package is dragging in liajit2 binary | |
| [15:31] <LocutusOfBorg> https://sources.debian.org/src/luajit/2.1.0~beta3%2Bgit20220320%2Bdfsg-4/debian/control/ | |
| [15:32] <LocutusOfBorg> Package: libluajit-5.1-2 | |
| [15:32] <LocutusOfBorg> Depends: libluajit2-5.1-2 [ppc64el s390x] | |
| [15:32] <LocutusOfBorg> so in this way everybody is happy (except for autopkgtests that are probably highlighting real bugs) | |
| [15:35] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ok, do we not need to rebuild the revdeps of libluajit-5.1-2 on ppc64el? | |
| === fnordahl_ is now known as fnordahl | |
| [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: octave-symbolic [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [2.9.1~git.2022.06.09-1] (no packageset) | |
| [18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (jammy-proposed) [1.36.6-0ubuntu2] | |
| [18:30] <seb128> could a SRU team member review network-manager in the J queue? it fixes a regression with the current SRU which migrated to updates and I would like to see the fix accepted before it's friday/weekend and creates more delay | |
| [18:35] <bdmurray> seb128: I had it on my list and did around the time you asked | |
| [18:36] <bdmurray> As queuebot can attest to | |
| [19:21] <seb128> bdmurray, thanks! | |
| [21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-xmlrpc (jammy-proposed/main) [0.3.2-1 => 0.3.2-1ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) | |
| [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: django-invitations [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.9.3-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lamassemble [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4.2-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lamassemble [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4.2-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dnarrange [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.5.1-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-dommatrix [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.0.3+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lamassemble [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4.2-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lamassemble [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4.2-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: psd-tools [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.9.20+dfsg.1-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lamassemble [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/none) [1.4.2-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtpim-opensource-src [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0~git20201102.f9a8f0fc+dfsg1-2] (qt5) | |
| [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtpim-opensource-src [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0~git20201102.f9a8f0fc+dfsg1-2] (qt5) | |
| [23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtpim-opensource-src [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0~git20201102.f9a8f0fc+dfsg1-2] (qt5) | |
| [23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lamassemble [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.4.2-1] (no packageset) | |
| [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtpim-opensource-src [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0~git20201102.f9a8f0fc+dfsg1-2] (qt5) | |