|
arXiv:1001.0027v1 [astro-ph.GA] 30 Dec 2009New candidate Planetary Nebulae in the IPHAS survey: the cas e of |
|
PNe with ISM interaction. |
|
Laurence SabinA, Albert A. ZijlstraA, Christopher WareingB, Romano L.M. |
|
CorradiC, Antonio MampasoC, Kerttu ViironenC, Nicholas J. WrightDand |
|
Quentin A. ParkerE |
|
AJodrell Bank Center for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, |
|
Manchester M13 9PL, UK |
|
BDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Leeds, Le eds, LS2 9JT, UK |
|
CInstituto de Astrofisica de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain |
|
DHarvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St reet, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA |
|
EMacquarie University/Anglo-Australian Observatory, Dep artment of Physics, North Ryde, Sydney |
|
NSW 2190, AUSTRALIA |
|
AEmail: [email protected] |
|
Abstract: We present the results of the search for candidate Planetary Nebulae interacting with |
|
the interstellar medium (PN-ISM) in the framework of the INT Photometric H αSurvey (IPHAS) |
|
and located in the right ascension range 18h-20h. The detect ion capability of this new Northern |
|
survey, in terms of depth and imaging resolution, has allowe d us to overcome the detection problem |
|
generally associated to the low surface brightness inheren t to PNe-ISM. We discuss the detection of |
|
21 IPHAS PN-ISM candidates. Thus, different stages of intera ction were observed, implying various |
|
morphologies i.e. from the unaffected to totally disrupted s hapes. The majority of the sources belong |
|
to the so-called WZO2 stage which main characteristic is a br ightening of the nebula’s shell in the |
|
direction of motion. The new findings are encouraging as they would be a first step into the reduction |
|
of the scarcity of observational data and they would provide new insights into the physical processes |
|
occurring in the rather evolved PNe. |
|
Keywords: Planetary nebulae, ISM interaction, survey. |
|
1 Introduction |
|
Large Hαsurveys have so far allowed the detection of |
|
∼3000 planetary nebulae (PNe) in the Galaxy. The |
|
data can be principally found in the Strasbourg-ESO |
|
Catalogue (Acker et al.1992)andtherecentMacquarie- |
|
AAO-StrasbourgH αPlanetaryNebulaCatalogues: MASH |
|
IandII(Parker et al.(2006)andMiszalski et al(2008)). |
|
Unfortunatelyalimitation inour understandingofthis |
|
short and rather complex phase of stellar evolution lies |
|
either in the deepness of the detections realised or the |
|
type of PNe investigated. Indeed, although enormous |
|
progress has been made over the years in terms of ob- |
|
servations, the well-studied PNe are generally bright |
|
and often young. This hampers the study of: |
|
•PNe hidden by the interstellar medium, partic- |
|
ularly those located at low galactic height. |
|
•PNe with (very)low surface brightness where we |
|
find the group of old PNe. |
|
•Very distant PNe which appear as unresolved |
|
and not recognisable as nebulae.•PNe located in crowded areas such as the galac- |
|
tic plane. |
|
Moreover, excluding these objects from global studies |
|
(morphology, abundances,luminosityfunction...etc)may |
|
bias our understanding of planetary nebulae. As an il- |
|
lustration, few PNe are described in the literature as |
|
“PNe with ISM interaction”, which is the step before |
|
the complete dilution of the nebulae in the interstel- |
|
lar medium (Borkowski et al. (1990), Ali et al. (2000), |
|
Xilouris et al. (1996) and Tweedy et al. (1996)). The |
|
study of the interaction process would give new in- |
|
sights intoseveral aspects of the PNevolution. Indeed, |
|
the density difference between ISM and PNe will affect |
|
their shape. This is expected to be observable in old |
|
objects where the nebular density declines sufficiently |
|
to be overcome by the ISM density. Other phenom- |
|
ena like the flux and brightness enhancement following |
|
the compression of the external shell, the increase of |
|
the recombination rate in the PN Rauch et al. (2000), |
|
the occurrence of turbulent Rayleigh-Taylor instabili- |
|
ties and the implication of magnetic fields Dgani et al. |
|
(1998) are among the physical processes which need |
|
to be addressed not only from a theoretical but also |
|
observational point of view. |
|
12 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia |
|
The low surface brightness generally associated to |
|
PNe-ISM has for a long time prevented any deeper ob- |
|
servation and good statistical study of these interac- |
|
tions, where only the interacting rim is well seen. New |
|
generations of H αsurveys have overcome this prob- |
|
lem. A perfect example is the discovery of PFP 1 by |
|
Pierce et al. (2004)intheframeworkoftheAAO/UKST |
|
SuperCOSMOS H αsurvey (SHS) (Parker et al. 2005). |
|
This PN, starting to interact with the ISM at the |
|
rim, is very large (radius = 1.5 ±0.6 pc) and very |
|
faint (logarithm of the H αsurface brightness equal |
|
to -6.05 ergcm−2.s−1.sr−1). In order to unveil and |
|
study this “missing PN population” in the Northern |
|
hemisphere we need surveys providing the necessary |
|
observing depth: the Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) |
|
Photometric H αSurvey (IPHAS) is one of them and |
|
will complete the work done in the South by the SHS. |
|
2 IPHAS contribution |
|
IPHAS is a new fully photometric CCD survey of the |
|
Northern Galactic Plane, started in 2003 (Drew et al. |
|
(2005), Gonzalez-Solares et al (2008)) and which has |
|
now been completed1. Using the 2.5m Isaac Newton |
|
Telescope (INT)in LaPalma (Canary Islands, SPAIN) |
|
and the Wide Field Camera (WFC) offering a field of |
|
view of 34.2 ×34.2 arcmin2, IPHAS targets the Galac- |
|
tic plane in the Northern hemisphere, at a latitude |
|
range of -5◦<b<5◦and covers 1800 deg2. This |
|
international survey is conducted not only in H αbut |
|
also makes use of two continuum filters, respectively |
|
the Sloan r’ and i’. IPHAS is viewed as an enhance- |
|
ment to former narrow-band surveys, first due to the |
|
use of CCD and the particularly small pixel scale al- |
|
lowed bytheWFCwith0.33 arcsec pix−1butalso (and |
|
mainly) due to the depth reached for point sources de- |
|
tection. Thus sources with a r’ magnitude between 13 |
|
and 19.5-20 could be detected with a very good pho- |
|
tometric accuracy. The most interesting characteristic |
|
for our purpose is the ability to detect resolved ex- |
|
tended emissions with an H αsurface brightness down |
|
to 2×10−17erg cm−2s−1arcsec−2. |
|
In this paper we will focus on extended (candi- |
|
date) PNe (i.e. objects with a size greater than 5 arc- |
|
sec). They were searched for via a visual inspection of |
|
2 deg2Hα-r(continuum removal) mosaics made from |
|
the different IPHAS observations. And in order to al- |
|
low the detection of objects of multiple size and bright- |
|
ness level, the mosaics were binned at respectively 15 |
|
pixels×15 pixels (5 arcsec) and 5 pixels ×5 pixels (1.7 |
|
arcsec). The first binning level, which is of particu- |
|
lar interest to us, helps to detect resolved, low surface |
|
brightness objects (down to the IPHAS limit) and to |
|
accentuate the contours/shape of the nebulae (this is |
|
particularly useful to see, for example, the full extent |
|
of an outflow or a tail). The second set, is used to de- |
|
tect intermediate size nebulae i.e. smaller than ∼15-20 |
|
arcsec in diameter. |
|
1http://www.iphas.orgThe first area that has been fully investigated is the re- |
|
gion between RA=18h and RA=20h. We detected 233 |
|
candidate PNe among which other nebulosities may be |
|
found e.g. small HII regions (Sabin, PhD thesis, to be |
|
published). Around 20% of this sample have been so |
|
far spectroscopically confirmed as PNe (Sabin et al., |
|
in preparation). If we look at the particularities of the |
|
PNe and candidate PNe uncovered, we observe that |
|
from thepointofviewofthesize, large objects (greater |
|
than 20 arcsec) constitute the main new group (Fig. |
|
1). As large objects are generally considered as more |
|
evolved, we are confident in finding in this group new |
|
old PNe and byextension new cases of PNe interacting |
|
with the surrounding ISM (PNe/ISM). |
|
Figure 1: Galactic distribution of the IPHAS neb- |
|
ulae according to their size. |
|
3 Candidate PNewith ISMin- |
|
teraction |
|
Fundamental in PN development, the interaction with |
|
the ISM does not only concern old PNe, as may be |
|
commonly thought. Indeed, the PN-ISM interaction |
|
has mainly been detected in a rather small number of |
|
nebulae, which are generally bright objects (“young” |
|
and“mid-age”PNe). Rauch et al.(2000)andWareing et al. |
|
(2007) showed that different stages of interaction are |
|
exhibited during the PNe life. The low surface bright- |
|
ness, generally associated with nebulae mixing with |
|
the ISM and “old” PNe, has for a long time prevented |
|
any deeper observation and good statistical study of |
|
these interactions. Although faint objects will still re- |
|
main difficult to detect, the IPHAS survey provides |
|
a noticeable improvement. Nevertheless, a caveat is |
|
the difficulty to visually separate PNe-ISM from other |
|
faint and extended structures like old HII regions, Su- |
|
pernovae (SNRs) or diffuse H αstructures. As an ex- |
|
ample, faint bow shocks generally characteristics ofwww.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa 3 |
|
PNemixingwiththeISMcanalsobefilamentarystruc- |
|
tures from old SNRs. A spectroscopic analysis is the |
|
only way to have a clear identification. |
|
The work presented here is based on the classification |
|
from Wareing et al. (2007) (WZO 1-4 called after the |
|
authors’ names) and will allow us to establish the de- |
|
gree of interaction for each nebula. Their classifica- |
|
tion is the result of the first extensive investigation |
|
of the applicable parameter space, varying stellar pa- |
|
rameters, relative velocities through the ISM and ISM |
|
densities. |
|
The depth reached by the IPHAS survey combined |
|
with the binning detection method allowed us to iden- |
|
tify 21 cases of interacting candidate PNe. |
|
3.1 WZO1 type |
|
The first group of PNe/ISM concerns those where the |
|
main PN is still unaffected and which may display a |
|
distant bow shock. In our area of study (18h-20h), the |
|
majority of candidates answer the first condition, but |
|
none show the outer bow shock. Outside this area, the |
|
nicknamed“EarNebula”orIPHASXJ205013.7+465518 |
|
with a 6 arcmin size may be coincident with a WZO1 |
|
description as this object is a confirmed bipolar PN |
|
(Fig. 3) surrounded by a shell which may be an AGB |
|
remnant shell or would indicate a multiple shell nebula |
|
(Fig. 2). |
|
3.2 WZO2 type |
|
This category concerns PNe showing a bright rim in |
|
the direction of motion. This is the most common fea- |
|
ture found in our sample and 17 objects out of 21 fall |
|
under this classification. Fig. 4 presents 3 examples |
|
with different angular sizes, although they all display |
|
a diameter on the order of a few arcmin (we consid- |
|
ered the assumed full extent of the round nebulae). |
|
We point out in Fig. 4-Top the difficulty to determine |
|
the true direction of motion regarding the CS position |
|
and off-axis bow shock. Such a geometry could be ex- |
|
plained by an ISM gradient from high on the left to |
|
low on the right. We also notice a particularly low |
|
observed surface brightness (SB) which may explain |
|
previous non detections. |
|
3.3 WZO3 type |
|
This type is exemplified by PNe whose geometric cen- |
|
tres are shifted away from the central star (CS): both |
|
are no longer coincident. An example, is the ancient |
|
PN Sh 2-188 around which IPHAS has uncovered an |
|
extended structure (Wareing et al. 2006). We identi- |
|
fied 3 candidate PNe coincident with this description. |
|
The most probing WZO3 type in our sample is pre- |
|
sented in figure 5 and corresponds, according to hy- |
|
drodynamical models, to a PN with a CS velocity of |
|
about 100 km/s.3.4 WZO4 type |
|
The WZO4 corresponds to the most difficult types of |
|
PN to be detected: the CS has left the vicinity of |
|
the now totally disrupted PN, leaving an amorphous |
|
structure. The challenge does not lie in the detection |
|
ability (it enters in the IPHAS range of detection) but |
|
more intheselection oftheobjects as possible PNedue |
|
to the total lack of symmetry or axi-symmetry. This |
|
type of interaction is also discussed in more detail by |
|
Wareing et al. in these proceedings. |
|
We identified 1 candidate PN which could fit the |
|
given description. Fig. 6 presents the selected can- |
|
didate in the top panel. We suggest the the nebular |
|
material has been moved from the front to the rear |
|
leaving a remnant “wall of material”. We also notice |
|
that some features may be linked to turbulence effects. |
|
The comparison with the hydrodynamical model (bot- |
|
tom panel) seems to support this hypothesis. Nev- |
|
ertheless a spectroscopic confirmation of the nebula’s |
|
nature will be needed. The model implies a velocity |
|
relative to the ISM of 100 Km/s and an evolution in |
|
the post-AGB phase of 10 000 years. |
|
3.5 Distribution of the candidates |
|
Fig. 7-top shows that the majority of the WZO2 nebu- |
|
lae typesare locatedinzones ofrelatively lowISMden- |
|
sity (compared to the Galactic Centre). The low stress |
|
exerted on the nebulae may explain why they still keep |
|
their quasi circular shape. The ISM is more dense in |
|
the Galactic Plane than in the zone towards the anti- |
|
centreor thezoneaboveaheightof100pc(from obser- |
|
vation of neutral hydrogen gas, Dickey et al. (1990)). |
|
We therefore expected a greater influence of the in- |
|
teraction process in this area. Indeed, we observed |
|
that the most advanced stages of interaction, namely |
|
WZO3 and WZO4, are detected in areas of high ISM |
|
density, where PN are more likely to be affected by |
|
such densities. |
|
Thesizedistribution, Fig. 7-bottom, indicatesthat |
|
althoughmostofthedetectedcandidatePNearelarge2, |
|
i.e with a size greater than 100 arcsec, or of medium |
|
size i.e. between 20 and 100 arcsec, small nebulae |
|
also show signs of interaction. This confirms that the |
|
ISM interaction process does not “a priori” only im- |
|
ply “old” nebulae. We also observe that large objects |
|
mainly lie at higher latitudes than smaller nebulae but |
|
it is also interesting to notice that we detect large ob- |
|
jects inzones ofhighextinction; large PNeseemtosur- |
|
vive at relatively low latitudes. They would undergo |
|
strong alteration by the ISM and would display more |
|
advanced stages of interaction. Those disruptions tend |
|
to affect them more than smaller size nebulae at the |
|
same latitude range. |
|
4 Conclusion and Perspectives |
|
In the first fully analysed area of the Galactic plane, |
|
RA=18h to RA=20h, the new H αphotometric survey |
|
2The sizes here are defined in terms of angular sizes, so |
|
the physical correspondence will depend on the distance.4 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia |
|
IPHASappearstobeanexcellenttooltostudyPNein- |
|
teracting with the ISM. Indeed the survey contributes |
|
to the detection of nebulae so far hidden mainly due to |
|
their faintness. Thus, 21 objects have been identified |
|
aspossible planetarynebulaeinteractingwiththeISM. |
|
They show diverse sizes (although the majority display |
|
a diameter greater than 100 arcsec) and morphologies |
|
corresponding to the four different cases of interaction |
|
commonly defined going from the unaffected to the to- |
|
tally disrupted nebula. The most common stage is the |
|
WZO2correspondingtonebulaeshowingabrightening |
|
of their rim in the direction of motion. This is coinci- |
|
dent with the observations made by Wareing and al (in |
|
these proceedings) crossing different H αsurveys. We |
|
were also able to reach those targets at low latitudes |
|
and found that some could survive in those environ- |
|
ments although they would be strongly affected by the |
|
ISM. The total lack of PNe/ISM at the highest point |
|
of ISM density (b= ±0.5 deg and 30 deg <l<50 deg) |
|
can either be due to the limitation of IPHAS or be- |
|
cause they have been totally destroyed by the effects |
|
of ISM interaction. |
|
The next logical step is the spectroscopic identification |
|
of these sources, their central star study and physical |
|
size determination. The low surface brightness implies |
|
the use of particular means such as integral field spec- |
|
troscopy to be able to retrieve the maximum infor- |
|
mation. Therefore a new programme of IPHAS PN |
|
candidate follow-up spectroscopy led by Q. Parker, A. |
|
Zijlstra and R. Corradi is now underway. |
|
References |
|
Acker, A., Marcout, J., Ochsenbein, F., Stenholm, B. |
|
, Tylenda, R.,1992, Garching: European Southern |
|
Observatory,Strasbourg - ESO catalogue of galactic |
|
planetary nebulae. Part 1; Part 2. |
|
Ali, A., El-Nawawy, M. S. and Pfleiderer, J., 2000, |
|
APSS, 271, 245. |
|
Borkowski, K. J., Sarazin, C. L. and Soker, N., 1990, |
|
Apj, 360,173. |
|
Dgani, R. and Soker, N., 1998, 495, 337. |
|
Dickey, J. M. and Lockman, F. J.,1990,ARAA,28,215 |
|
Drew, J. E., Greimel, R., Irwin, M. J., Aungwero- |
|
jwit, A., Barlow, M. J., Corradi, R. L. M., Drake, |
|
J. J.., G¨ ansicke, B. T., Groot, P. and 26 co- |
|
authors,2005,MNRAS,362,753. |
|
Gonzalez-Solares, E. A., Walton, N. A., Greimel, R. |
|
and Drew, J. E., Irwin, M. J., Sale, S. E., Andrews, |
|
K., Aungwerojwit, A., Barlow, M. J. and 41 co- |
|
authors, 2008,MNRAS,388,89. |
|
Miszalski, B., Parker, Q. A., Acker, A., |
|
Birkby, J. L., Frew, D. J. and Kovacevic, |
|
A.,2008,MNRAS,384,525.Parker, Q. A., Phillipps, S., Pierce, M. J., Hartley, M., |
|
Hambly, N. C., Read, M. A., MacGillivray, H. T., |
|
Tritton, S. B., Cass, C. P., Cannon, R. D., Cohen, |
|
M., Drew, J. E., Frew, D. J., Hopewell, E., Mader, |
|
S., Malin, D. F., Masheder, M. R. W., Morgan, |
|
D. H., Morris, R. A. H., Russeil, D., Russell, K. S. |
|
and Walker, R. N. F., 2005, MNRAS, 362, 689. |
|
Parker,Q. A., Acker, A., Frew, D. J., Hartley, |
|
M., Peyaud, A. E. J., Ochsenbein, F., Phillipps, |
|
S., Russeil, D., Beaulieu, S. F., Cohen, M., |
|
K¨ oppen, J., Miszalski, B., Morgan, D. H., Mor- |
|
ris, R. A. H., Pierce, M. J. and Vaughan, |
|
A. E.,2006,MNRAS,373,79. |
|
Pierce, M. J., Frew, D. J., Parker, Q. A. and K¨ oppen, |
|
J., 2004, PASP, 21, 334. |
|
Rauch,T., Furlan, E., Kerber, F. and Roth, |
|
M.,2000,ASP Conf. Ser:Asymmetrical Planetary |
|
Nebulae II,199,341. |
|
Riesgo, H. and L´ opez, J. A.,2006,Revista Mexicana de |
|
Astronomia y Astrofisica,42,47-51 |
|
Tweedy, R. W. and Kwitter, K. B., 1996, ApJS, 107, |
|
255. |
|
Wareing, C. J., O’Brien, T. J., Zijlstra, A. A., Kwitter, |
|
K. B., Irwin, J., Wright, N., Greimel, R. and Drew |
|
, J. E.,2006,MNRAS,366,387. |
|
Wareing, C. J., Zijlstra, A. A. and O’Brien, |
|
T. J.,2007,MNRAS,382,1233. |
|
Xilouris, K. M., Papamastorakis, J., Paleologou, E. |
|
and Terzian, Y., 1996, AAP, 310, 603.www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa 5 |
|
Direction of motionThick outer |
|
Filamentsshell: rim |
|
+ Bipolar outflowBright edges of the bipolar |
|
Sharp structures |
|
Faint opposite edge |
|
Figure 2: An example of WZO1 type: The “Ear Nebula” IPHAS PN. Nort h on the top and East on the |
|
left. |
|
/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 |
|
/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0 |
|
/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1/1erg/cm2/s/A erg/cm2/s/A |
|
Figure 3: WHT spectra of the “EarNebula” using the R300Band R158 R gratings. This nebula, for which |
|
we show some of the “strongest” emission lines useful for an identifi cation, presents a clear [NII] over- |
|
intensity and it has been confirmed as true PN using the revised diagn ostic diagram from Riesgo et al. |
|
(2006) (particularly the log [H α/[SII]]vslog [Hα/[NII]] diagram).6 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia |
|
Interacting rimDirection of motion |
|
CS candidate |
|
Direction of motion |
|
Geometric centerBow shock CS candidates |
|
Direction of motionCS candidateBright rim |
|
Figure 4: Examples of WZO2 types. Top: Size=1.2 arcmin and SB=3.4e−17erg cm−2s−1arcsec−2. |
|
Middle: Size= 8.5 arcmin and SB=1.1e−16erg cm−2s−1arcsec−2, Bottom: 4.3 arcmin and SB=2.7e−16 |
|
erg cm−2s−1arcsec−2. North on the top and East on the left. |
|
Direction of motion |
|
Most probable CS |
|
Bright rim |
|
Figure 5: WZO3 type of ISM interaction in a IPHAS candidate PNe. Nor th on the top and East on the |
|
left.www.publish.csiro.au/journals/pasa 7 |
|
|
|
Direction of motion |
|
Dense "wall" of nebular material gas and dust |
|
or |
|
turbulences Traces ofFaint frontal bow shock |
|
Figure 6: A possible example of WZO4 ISM interaction in one IPHAS PN ca ndidate (top: North on the |
|
top and East on the left) with the corresponding hydrodynamical m odel (bottom) [reproduction of figure |
|
5(d) from Wareing et al. (2007)].8 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia |
|
Figure 7: Galactic distribution of the candidate PNe/ISM according t o their stage of interaction and |
|
their size. |
|
Figure 8: Example of candidates with sizes greater than 100 arcsec (respectively 7.7 and 2.9 arcmin) and |
|
located at b= ±1 deg. These objects present a WZO2 stage of interaction and only their (very) faint |
|
interacting rim are seen. |