,text,id,label | |
0,"Typical examples are Bulgarian ( Simov et al. , 2005 ; Simov and Osenova , 2003 ) , Chinese ( Chen et al. , 2003 ) , Danish ( Kromann , 2003 ) , and Swedish ( Nilsson et al. , 2005 ) .",0,0 | |
1,"This appeared to solve the problem , and the results presented later for the average degree of generalisation do not show an over-generalisation compared with those given in Li and Abe ( 1998 ) .",1,2 | |
2,"These observations and this line of reasoning has not escaped the attention of theoretical linguists : Hale and Keyser ( 1993 ) propose that argument structure is , in fact , encoded syntactically .",2,0 | |
3,"inter-document references in the form of hyperlinks ( Agrawal et al. , 2003 ) .",3,0 | |
4,"While IA is generally thought to be consistent with findings on human language production ( Hermann and Deutsch 1976 ; Levelt 1989 ; Pechmann 1989 ; Sonnenschein 1982 ) , the hypothesis that incrementality is a good model of human GRE seems unfalsifiable until a preference order is specified for the properties on which it operates .",4,0 | |
5,"Arabic has two kinds of plurals : broken plurals and sound plurals ( Wightwick and Gaafar , 1998 ; Chen and Gey , 2002 ) .",5,0 | |
6,"Secondly , as ( Blunsom et al. , 2008 ) show , marginalizing out the different segmentations during decoding leads to improved performance .",6,5 | |
7,"Nivre ( 2008 ) reports experiments on Arabic parsing using his MaltParser ( Nivre et al. 2007 ) , trained on the PADT .",7,0 | |
8,"More recently , ( Sebastiani , 2002 ) has performed a good survey of document categorization ; recent works can also be found in ( Joachims , 2002 ) , ( Crammer and Singer , 2003 ) , and ( Lewis et al. , 2004 ) .",8,0 | |
9,"The grammar conversion from LTAG to HPSG ( Yoshinaga and Miyao , 2001 ) is the core portion of the RenTAL system .",9,0 | |
10,"This includes work on question answering ( Wang et al. , 2007 ) , sentiment analysis ( Nakagawa et al. , 2010 ) , MT reordering ( Xu et al. , 2009 ) , and many other tasks .",10,0 | |
11,"Our knowledge extractors rely extensively on MetaMap ( Aronson 2001 ) , a system for identifying segments of text that correspond to concepts in the UMLS Metathesaurus .",11,1 | |
12,"We study the cases where a 9Recall that even the Keller and Lapata ( 2003 ) system , built on the world 's largest corpus , achieves only 34 % recall ( Table 1 ) ( with only 48 % of positives and 27 % of all pairs previously observed , but see Footnote 5 ) .",12,2 | |
13,"Inspired by ( Blunsom et al. , 2009 ) and ( Cohn and Blunsom , 2009 ) , we define P ( str | frag ) as follows : where csw is the number of words in the source string .",13,4 | |
14,"Inspired by ( Blunsom et al. , 2009 ) and ( Cohn and Blunsom , 2009 ) , we define P ( str | frag ) as follows : where csw is the number of words in the source string .",14,4 | |
15,"The TNT POS tagger ( Brants , 2000 ) has also been designed to train and run very quickly , tagging between 30,000 and 60,000 words per second .",15,0 | |
16,"Some previous works ( Bannard and Callison-Burch , 2005 ; Zhao et al. , 2009 ; Kouylekov et al. , 2009 ) indicate , as main limitations of the mentioned resources , their limited coverage , their low precision , and the fact that they are mostly suitable to capture relations mainly between single words .",16,0 | |
17,"Similarly , Cowan and Collins ( 2005 ) report that the use of a subset of Spanish morphological features ( number for adjectives , determiners , nouns , pronouns , and verbs ; and mode for verbs ) outperforms other combinations .",17,0 | |
18,"To solve these scaling issues , we implement Online Variational Bayesian Inference ( Hoffman et al. , 2010 ; Hoffman et al. , 2012 ) for our models .",18,1 | |
19,"Other studies which view lR as a query generation process include Maron and Kuhns , 1960 ; Hiemstra and Kraaij , 1999 ; Ponte and Croft , 1998 ; Miller et al , 1999 .",19,2 | |
20,"As a result , researchers have re-adopted the once-popular knowledge-rich approach , investigating a variety of semantic knowledge sources for common noun resolution , such as the semantic relations between two NPs ( e.g. , Ji et al. ( 2005 ) ) , their semantic similarity as computed using WordNet ( e.g. , Poesio et al. ( 2004 ) ) or Wikipedia ( Ponzetto and Strube , 2006 ) , and the contextual role played by an NP ( see Bean and Riloff ( 2004 ) ) .",20,0 | |
21,"There have been many studies on parsing techniques ( Poller and Becker , 1998 ; Flickinger et al. , 2000 ) , ones on disambiguation models ( Chiang , 2000 ; Kanayama et al. , 2000 ) , and ones on programming/grammar-development environ -",21,0 | |
22,"An example of this is the estimation of maximum entropy models , from simple iterative estimation algorithms used by Ratnaparkhi ( 1998 ) that converge very slowly , to complex techniques from the optimisation literature that converge much more rapidly ( Malouf , 2002 ) .",22,0 | |
23,"For example , such schema can serve as a mean to represent translation examples , or find structural correspondences for the purpose of transfer grammar learning ( Menezes & Richardson , 2001 ) , ( Aramaki et al. , 2001 ) , ( Watanabe et al. , 2000 ) , ( Meyers et al. , 2000 ) , ( Matsumoto et al. , 1993 ) , ( kaji et al. , 1992 ) , and example-base machine translation EBMT3 ( Sato & Nagao , 1990 ) , ( Sato , 1991 ) , ( Richardson et al. , 2001 ) , ( Al-Adhaileh & Tang , 1999 ) .",23,0 | |
24,"Later works , such as Atallah et al. ( 2001a ) , Bolshakov ( 2004 ) , Taskiran et al. ( 2006 ) and Topkara et al. ( 2006b ) , further made use of part-ofspeech taggers and electronic dictionaries , such as WordNet and VerbNet , to increase the robustness of the method .",24,0 | |
25,"results are based on a corpus of movie subtitles ( Tiedemann 2007 ) , and are consequently shorter sentences , whereas the En â Es results are based on a corpus of parliamentary proceedings ( Koehn 2005 ) .",25,1 | |
26,"We work with a semi-technical text on meteorological phenomena ( Larrick , 1961 ) , meant for primary school students .",26,1 | |
27,"This Principle of Finitism is also assumed by Johnson-Laird ( 1983 ) , Jackendoff ( 1983 ) , Kamp ( 1981 ) , and implicitly or explicitly by almost all researchers in computational linguistics .",27,2 | |
28,The candidate feature templates include : Voice from Sun and Jurafsky ( 2004 ) .,28,1 | |
29,"Over the past decade , researchers at IBM have developed a series of increasingly sophisticated statistical models for machine translation ( Brown et al. , 1988 ; Brown et al. , 1990 ; Brown et al. , 1993a ) .",29,0 | |
30,The PICO framework ( Richardson et al. 1995 ) for capturing well-formulated clinical queries ( described in Section 2 ) can serve as the basis of a knowledge representation that bridges the needs of clinicians and analytical capabilities of a system .,30,0 | |
31,The Chinese PropBank has labeled the predicateargument structures of sentences from the Chinese TreeBank ( Xue et al. 2005 ) .,31,1 | |
32,"Furthermore , manually selected word pairs are often biased towards highly related pairs ( Gurevych , 2006 ) , because human annotators tend to select only highly related pairs connected by relations they are aware of .",32,0 | |
33,"Disjunctive feature descriptions are also possible ; WIT incorporates an efficient method for handling disjunctions ( Nakano , 1991 ) .",33,1 | |
34,Our strategy is based on the approach presented by Johnson et al. ( 2007 ) .,34,1 | |
35,"Indeed , contrary to the more classical statistical methods ( Mutual Information , Loglike ... , see below ) used for collocation acquisition ( see ( Pearce , 2002 ) for a review ) , these patterns allow :",35,0 | |
36,"A further complication is that different speakers can regard very different values as prototypical , making it difficult to assess which of two objects is greener even on one dimension ( Berlin and Kay 1969 , pages 10 -- 12 ) .",36,0 | |
37,"The M step then treats c as fixed , observed data and adjusts 0 until the predicted vector of total feature counts equals c , using Improved Iterative Scaling ( Della Pietra et al. , 1997 ; Chen and",37,1 | |
38,"Both kinds of annotation were carried out using ANVIL ( Kipp , 2004 ) .",38,1 | |
39,The article classifier is a discriminative model that draws on the state-of-the-art approach described in Rozovskaya et al. ( 2012 ) .,39,1 | |
40,"The language grounding problem has received significant attention in recent years , owed in part to the wide availability of data sets ( e.g. Flickr , Von Ahn ( 2006 ) ) , computing power , improved computer vision models ( Oliva and Torralba , 2001 ; Lowe , 2004 ; Farhadi et al. , 2009 ; Parikh and Grauman , 2011 ) and neurological evidence of ties between the language , perceptual and motor systems in the brain ( Pulverm ¨ uller et al. , 2005 ; Tettamanti et al. , 2005 ; Aziz-Zadeh et al. , 2006 ) .",40,0 | |
41,"Church ( 1995 , p. 294 ) studied , among other simple text normalization techniques , the effect of case normalization for different words and showed that `` sometimes case variants refer to the same thing ( hurricane and Hurricane ) , sometimes they refer to different things ( continental and Continental ) and sometimes they do n't refer to much of anything ( e.g. , anytime and Anytime ) . ''",41,0 | |
42,We follow the notation convention of Lari and Young ( 1990 ) .,42,1 | |
43,"Later works , such as Atallah et al. ( 2001a ) , Bolshakov ( 2004 ) , Taskiran et al. ( 2006 ) and Topkara et al. ( 2006b ) , further made use of part-ofspeech taggers and electronic dictionaries , such as WordNet and VerbNet , to increase the robustness of the method .",43,0 | |
44,Finkelstein et al. ( 2002 ) did not report inter-subject correlation for their larger dataset .,44,2 | |
45,This is a similar conclusion to our previous work in Salloum and Habash ( 2011 ) .,45,2 | |
46,We then use the program Snob ( Wallace and Boulton 1968 ; Wallace 2005 ) to cluster these experiences .,46,1 | |
47,"The priorities are used for disambiguating interpretation in the incremental understanding method ( Nakano et al. , 1999b ) .",47,1 | |
48,"A number of alignment techniques have been proposed , varying from statistical methods ( Brown et al. , 1991 ; Gale and Church , 1991 ) to lexical methods ( Kay and Roscheisen , 1993 ; Chen , 1993 ) .",48,0 | |
49,"Alshawi and Crouch ( 1992 ) present an illustrative first-order fragment along these lines and are able to supply a coherent formal semantics for the CLF-QLFs themselves , using a technique essentially equivalent to supervaluations : a QLF is true iff all its possible RQLFs are , false iff they are all false , and undefined otherwise .",49,0 | |
50,"We use the open-source Moses toolkit ( Koehn et al. , 2007 ) to build a phrase-based SMT system trained on mostly MSA data ( 64M words on the Arabic side ) obtained from several LDC corpora including some limited DA data .",50,1 | |
51,"This approach is taken , for example , in LKB ( Copestake 1992 ) where lexical rules are introduced on a par with phrase structure rules and the parser makes no distinction between lexical and nonlexical rules ( Copestake 1993 , 31 ) .",51,2 | |
52,"This confirms that although Kozima 's approach ( Kozima , 1993 ) is computationally expensive , it does produce more precise segmentation .",52,2 | |
53,Park and Byrd ( 2001 ) recently described a hybrid method for finding abbreviations and their definitions .,53,0 | |
54,"More specifically , the notion of the phrasal lexicon ( used first by Becker 1975 ) has been used successfully in a number of areas :",54,0 | |
55,Ushioda et al. ( 1993 ) run a finite-state NP parser on a POS-tagged corpus to calculate the relative frequency of the same six subcategorization verb classes .,55,0 | |
56,"This section , which elaborates on preliminary results reported in Demner-Fushman and Lin ( 2005 ) , describes extraction algorithms for population , problems , interventions , outcomes , and the strength of evidence .",56,3 | |
57,It would seem therefore that the iteration of the PT operation to form a closure is needed ( cfXXX Zadrozny 1987b ) .,57,2 | |
58,Sedivy et al. ( 1999 ) asked subjects to identify the target of a vague description in a visual scene .,58,0 | |
59,"Our most accurate single grammar achieves an F score of 91.6 on the WSJ test set , rivaling discriminative reranking approaches ( Charniak and Johnson , 2005 ) and products of latent variable grammars ( Petrov , 2010 ) , despite being a single generative PCFG .",59,2 | |
60,"Our recovery policy is modeled on the TargetedHelp ( Hockey et al. , 2003 ) policy used in task-oriented dialogue .",60,3 | |
61,"It has been argued that , in an incremental approach , gradable properties should be given a low preference ranking because they are difficult to process ( Krahmer and Theune 2002 ) .",61,2 | |
62,"` See ( King , 1994 ) for a discussion of the appropriateness of TIG for HPSG and a comparison with other feature logic approaches designed for HPSG .",62,0 | |
63,"Specifically , we used Decision Graphs ( Oliver 1993 ) for Doc-Pred , and SVMs ( Vapnik 1998 ) for Sent-Pred .11 Additionally , we used unigrams for clustering documents and sentences , and unigrams and bigrams for predicting document clusters and sentence clusters ( Sections 3.1.2 and 3.2.2 ) .",63,1 | |
64,"There are many plausible representations , such as pairs of trees from synchronous tree adjoining grammars ( Abeille et al. 1990 ; Shieber 1994 ; Candito 1998 ) , lexical conceptual structures ( Dorr 1992 ) and WordNet synsets ( Fellbaum 1998 ; Vossen 1998 ) .",64,0 | |
65,"ones , DIRT ( Lin and Pantel , 2001 ) , VerbOcean ( Chklovski and Pantel , 2004 ) , FrameNet ( Baker et al. , 1998 ) , and Wikipedia ( Mehdad et al. , 2010 ; Kouylekov et al. , 2009 ) .",65,0 | |
66,"In the latter case , we can also take care of transferring the value of z. However , as discussed by Meurers ( 1994 ) , creating several instances of lexical rules can be avoided .",66,4 | |
67,"It maximizes the probability of getting the entire DA sequence correct , but it does not necessarily find the DA sequence that has the most DA labels correct ( Dermatas and Kokkinakis 1995 ) .",67,0 | |
68,"A substring in the sentence that corresponds to a node in the representation tree is denoted by assigning the interval of the substring to SNODE of 2 These definitions are based on the discussion in ( Tang , 1994 ) and Boitet & Zaharin ( 1988 ) .",68,1 | |
69,"We found that the oldest system ( Brown et al. , 1992 ) yielded the best prototypes , and that using these prototypes gave state-of-the-art performance on WSJ , as well as improvements on nearly all of the non-English corpora .",69,0 | |
70,"Other definitions of predicates may be found in ( Gomez , 1998 ) .",70,0 | |
71,"For the sake of completeness , we report in this section also the results obtained adopting the `` basic solution '' proposed by ( Mehdad et al. , 2010 ) .",71,2 | |
72,"The representations used by Danlos ( 2000 ) , Gardent and Webber ( 1998 ) , or Stone and Doran ( 1997 ) are similar , but do not ( always ) explicitly represent the clause combining operations as labeled nodes .",72,0 | |
73,"Since earlier versions of the SNoW based CSCL were used only to identify single phrases ( Punyakanok and Roth , 2001 ; Munoz et al. , 1999 ) and never to identify a collection of several phrases at the same time , as we do here , we also trained and tested it under the exact conditions of CoNLL-2000 ( Tjong Kim Sang and Buchholz , 2000 ) to compare it to other shallow parsers .",73,3 | |
74,"If differences in meaning between senses are very fine-grained , distinguishing between them is hard even for humans ( Mihalcea and Moldovan , 2001 ) .6 Pairs containing such words are not suitable for evaluation .",74,0 | |
75,"The application of domain models and deep semantic knowledge to question answering has been explored by a variety of researchers ( e.g. , Jacquemart and Zweigenbaum 2003 , Rinaldi et al. 2004 ) , and was also the focus of recent workshops on question answering in restricted domains at ACL 2004 and AAAI 2005 .",75,0 | |
76,"Griffiths et al. ( 2007 ) helped pave the path for cognitive-linguistic multimodal research , showing that Latent Dirichlet Allocation outperformed Latent Semantic Analysis ( Deerwester et al. , 1990 ) in the prediction of association norms .",76,0 | |
77,"Although not the first to employ a generative approach to directly model content , the seminal work of Barzilay and Lee ( 2004 ) is a noteworthy point of reference and comparison .",77,2 | |
78,"Others include selectional preferences , transitivity ( Schoenmackers et al. , 2008 ) , mutual exclusion , symmetry , etc. .",78,0 | |
79,"⢠cross-language information retrieval ( e.g. , McCarley 1999 ) , ⢠multilingual document filtering ( e.g. , Oard 1997 ) , ⢠computer-assisted language learning ( e.g. , Nerbonne et al. 1997 ) , ⢠certain machine-assisted translation tools ( e.g. , Macklovitch 1994 ; Melamed 1996a ) , ⢠concordancing for bilingual lexicography ( e.g. , Catizone , Russell , and Warwick 1989 ; Gale and Church 1991 ) ,",79,0 | |
80,"For example , ( Fang et al. , 2001 ) discusses the evaluation of two different text categorization strategies with several variations of their feature spaces .",80,0 | |
81,"As stated before , the experiments are run in the ACE '04 framework ( NIST , 2004 ) where the system will identify mentions and will label them ( cfXXX Section 4 ) with a type ( person , organization , etc ) , a sub-type ( OrgCommercial , OrgGovernmental , etc ) , a mention level ( named , nominal , etc ) , and a class ( specific , generic , etc ) .",81,1 | |
82,"Thus , the second class of SBD systems employs machine learning techniques such as decision tree classifiers ( Riley 1989 ) , neural networks ( Palmer and Hearst 1994 ) , and maximum-entropy modeling ( Reynar and Ratnaparkhi 1997 ) .",82,0 | |
83,or quotation of messages in emails or postings ( see Mullen and Malouf ( 2006 ) but cfXXX Agrawal et al. ( 2003 ) ) .,83,0 | |
84,The first work to do this with topic models is Feng and Lapata ( 2010b ) .,84,0 | |
85,"The language chosen for semantic representation is a flat semantics along the line of ( Bos , 1995 ; Copestake et al. , 1999 ; Copestake et al. , 2001 ) .",85,2 | |
86,"Tetreault 's contribution features comparative evaluation involving the author 's own centering-based pronoun resolution algorithm called the Left-Right Centering algorithm ( LRC ) as well as three other pronoun resolution methods : Hobbs 's naive algorithm ( Hobbs 1978 ) , BFP ( Brennan , Friedman , and Pollard 1987 ) , and Strube 's 5list approach ( Strube 1998 ) .",86,0 | |
87,"For future work , we might investigate how machine learning algorithms , which are specifically designed for the problem of domain adaptation ( Blitzer et al. , 2007 ; Jiang and Zhai , 2007 ) , perform in comparison to our approach .",87,5 | |
88,"The X2 statistic is performing at least as well as G2 , throwing doubt on the claim by Dunning ( 1993 ) that the G2 statistic is better suited for use in corpus-based NLP .",88,2 | |
89,"Provided with the candidate fragment elements , we previously ( Wang and Callison-Burch , 2011 ) used a chunker3 to finalize the output fragments , in order to follow the linguistic definition of a ( para - ) phrase .",89,3 | |
90,"There is a rich literature on organization and lexical access of morphologically complex words where experiments have been conducted mainly for derivational suffixed words of English , Hebrew , Italian , French , Dutch , and few other languages ( Marslen-Wilson et al. , 2008 ; Frost et al. , 1997 ; Grainger , et al. , 1991 ; Drews and Zwitserlood , 1995 ) .",90,0 | |
91,"This method of incorporating dictionary information seems simpler than the method proposed by Brown et al. for their models ( Brown et al. , 1993b ) .",91,2 | |
92,"One important example is the constituentcontext model ( CCM ) of Klein and Manning ( 2002 ) , which was specifically designed to capture the linguistic observation made by Radford ( 1988 ) that there are regularities to the contexts in which constituents appear .",92,0 | |
93,"Japanese ( Kawata and Bartels , 2000 ) , despite a very high accuracy , is different in that attachment score drops from 98 % to 85 % , as we go from length 1 to 2 , which may have something to do with the data consisting of transcribed speech with very short utterances .",93,2 | |
94,"7 We ignore the rare `` false idafa '' construction ( Habash 2010 , p. 102 ) .",94,0 | |
95,"Various approaches for computing semantic relatedness of words or concepts have been proposed , e.g. dictionary-based ( Lesk , 1986 ) , ontology-based ( Wu and Palmer , 1994 ; Leacock and Chodorow , 1998 ) , information-based ( Resnik , 1995 ; Jiang and Conrath , 1997 ) or distributional ( Weeds and Weir , 2005 ) .",95,0 | |
96,"Some methods are based on likelihood ( Och and Ney , 2002 ; Blunsom et al. , 2008 ) , error rate ( Och , 2003 ; Zhao and Chen , 2009 ; Pauls et al. , 2009 ; Galley and Quirk , 2011 ) , margin ( Watanabe et al. , 2007 ; Chiang et al. , 2008 ) and ranking ( Hopkins and May , 2011 ) , and among which minimum error rate training ( MERT ) ( Och , 2003 ) is the most popular one .",96,0 | |
97,"We follow Lewis and Steedman ( 2014 ) in allowing a small set of generic , linguistically-plausible unary and binary grammar rules .",97,1 | |
98,( 7 ) NEIGHBOR : Research in lexical semantics suggests that the SC of an NP can be inferred from its distributionally similar NPs ( see Lin ( 1998a ) ) .,98,4 | |
99,"Discrepancies in length throw constituents off balance , and so prosodic phrasing will cross constituent boundaries in order to give the phrases similar lengths ; this is the case in Chickens were eating II the remaining green vegetables , where the subject-predicate boundary finds no prosodic correspondent .4 The most explicit version of this approach is the analysis presented in Gee and Grosjean ( 1983 ) ( henceforth G&G ) .",99,2 | |
100,"Our approach to the problem is more compatible with the empirical evidence we presented in our prior work ( Li et al. , 2014 ) where we analyzed the output of Chinese to English machine translation and found that there is no correlation between sentence length and MT quality .",100,2 | |
101,"For all experiments reported in this section we used the syntactic dependency parser MaltParser v1 .3 ( Nivre 2003 , 2008 ; Kübler , McDonald , and Nivre 2009 ) , a transition-based parser with an input buffer and a stack , which uses SVM classifiers",101,1 | |
102,"Against the background of a growing interest in multilingual NLP , multilingual anaphora / coreference resolution has gained considerable momentum in recent years ( Aone and McKee 1993 ; Azzam , Humphreys , and Gaizauskas 1998 ; Harabagiu and Maiorano 2000 ; Mitkov and Barbu 2000 ; Mitkov 1999 ; Mitkov and Stys 1997 ; Mitkov , Belguith , and Stys 1998 ) .",102,0 | |
103,"We use the same data setting with Xue ( 2008 ) , however a bit different from Xue and Palmer ( 2005 ) .",103,2 | |
104,"They proved to be useful in a number of NLP applications such as natural language generation ( Iordanskaja et al. , 1991 ) , multidocument summarization ( McKeown et al. , 2002 ) , automatic evaluation of MT ( Denkowski and Lavie , 2010 ) , and TE ( Dinu and Wang , 2009 ) .",104,4 | |
105,"Moreover , a sandbox is a temporary view of a document itself i.e. a sandbox can not cause a change in the history ( Cunningham and Leuf , 2001 ) .",105,0 | |
106,"Regarding future work , there are many research line that may be followed : i ) Capturing more features by employing external knowledge such as ontological , lexical resource or WordNet-based features ( Basili et al. , 2005a ; Basili et al. , 2005b ; Bloehdorn et al. , 2006 ; Bloehdorn and Moschitti , 2007 ) or shallow semantic trees , ( Giuglea and Moschitti , 2004 ; Giuglea and Moschitti , 2006 ; Moschitti and Bejan , 2004 ; Moschitti et al. , 2007 ; Moschitti , 2008 ; Moschitti et al. , 2008 ) .",106,5 | |
107,"Another line of research approaches grounded language knowledge by augmenting distributional approaches of word meaning with perceptual information ( Andrews et al. , 2009 ; Steyvers , 2010 ; Feng and Lapata , 2010b ; Bruni et al. , 2011 ; Silberer and Lapata , 2012 ; Johns and Jones , 2012 ; Bruni et al. , 2012a ; Bruni et al. , 2012b ; Silberer et al. , 2013 ) .",107,0 | |
108,"Future research should apply the work of Blunsom et al. ( 2008 ) and Blunsom and Osborne ( 2008 ) , who marginalize over derivations to find the most probable translation rather than the most probable derivation , to these multi-nonterminal grammars .",108,5 | |
109,"We have since improved the interface by incorporating a capability in the recognizer to propose additional solutions in turn once the first one fails to parse ( Zue et al. 1991 ) To produce these `` N-best '' alternatives , we make use of a standard A * search algorithm ( Hart 1968 , Jelinek 1976 ) .",109,1 | |
110,Curran ( 2003 ),110,0 | |
111,"OT therefore holds out the promise of simplifying grammars , by factoring all complex phenomena into simple surface-level constraints that partially mask one another .1 Whether this is always possible under an appropriate definition of `` simple constraints '' ( e.g. , Eisner 1997b ) is of course an empirical question .",111,0 | |
112,"Consider , for example , the lexical rule in Figure 2 , which encodes a passive lexical rule like the one presented by Pollard and Sag ( 1987 , 215 ) in terms of the setup of Pollard and Sag ( 1994 , ch .",112,0 | |
113,"This result is consistent with other works using this model with these features ( Andrews et al. , 2009 ; Silberer and Lapata , 2012 ) .",113,2 | |