π Socials
Evangelion-7B
I was just curious to see if something special might happen if one uses:
The underlying model that I used was /Weyaxi/OpenHermes-2.5-neural-chat-v3-3-Slerp
.
Dataset
Dataset: /argilla/distilabel-intel-orca-dpo-pairs
The dataset was roughly ~3000 samples but they were high quality (according to the chosen_score).
The following filters were applied to the original dataset:
dataset = dataset.filter(
lambda r:
r["status"] != "tie" and
r["chosen_score"] >= 8 and
not r["in_gsm8k_train"]
)
Chat Template
I decided to go with the ChatML which is used for OpenHermes2.5 By the way I integreated the chat template into the models tokenizer.
<|im_start|>system
{system}<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>user
{user}<|im_end|>
<|im_start|>assistant
{asistant}<|im_end|>
Open LLM Leaderboard Evaluation Results
Detailed results can be found here
Metric | Value |
---|---|
Avg. | 71.71 |
AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot) | 68.94 |
HellaSwag (10-Shot) | 86.45 |
MMLU (5-Shot) | 63.97 |
TruthfulQA (0-shot) | 64.01 |
Winogrande (5-shot) | 79.95 |
GSM8k (5-shot) | 66.94 |
- Downloads last month
- 716
This model does not have enough activity to be deployed to Inference API (serverless) yet. Increase its social
visibility and check back later, or deploy to Inference Endpoints (dedicated)
instead.
Model tree for VitalContribution/Evangelion-7B
Dataset used to train VitalContribution/Evangelion-7B
Spaces using VitalContribution/Evangelion-7B 5
Evaluation results
- normalized accuracy on AI2 Reasoning Challenge (25-Shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard68.940
- normalized accuracy on HellaSwag (10-Shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard86.450
- accuracy on MMLU (5-Shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard63.970
- mc2 on TruthfulQA (0-shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard64.010
- accuracy on Winogrande (5-shot)validation set Open LLM Leaderboard79.950
- accuracy on GSM8k (5-shot)test set Open LLM Leaderboard66.940