Datasets:

tarekziade

/

profanity

like 2

HAPPY BIRTHDAY SIR CHOULES!!!

November 2008 Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Great job Aziza, I just edited and formatted your section on the standards of professional conduct. I also have added a citation on mission.

GoCarlisle GoCarlisle Was just announced in the Sentinel today as the boroughs new website, maybe its not up yet.

Message from you to an IP I received a message from you about editing something or other, no idea what it is about. You sent your message to an IP, one that is allocated dynamically. So the person who did the edits no longer owns this IP, I do, for now. Just thought you would like to know.

" Hi. Our Azad article has a ref ""Urdu declared official language of Azad Kashmir"" (Pakistan Times, 21 August 2005), though the link is now dead. I don't remember where I got the Gilgit–Baltistan info, but we make the same claim in the infobox of that article. Are our articles wrong? — "

I like what you did. Great job! Thanks! I especially like the fact that people can understand all the factors - the big picture, the individual versions, as well as the controversies ... all clearly labeled and easily available. Thanks again! (Talk)

Only in my hick town can you walk into a national sports bar and get Busch light in a can. SMH

" accurate.. Machida returned to his native Brazil to face Phil Davis on August 3, 2013 at UFC 163.[44][45] In a unanimous decision, Davis defeated Machida. This caused controversy among many MMA fans. [46][47] In one sample, 13 of 13 media outlets scored the bout in favor of Machida. ESPN scored it for Davis. [47] Davis had takedowns near the end of rounds one and two, and some moderate GNP, which formed the only significant offense of the fight. Many UFC affiliate bloggers and also scored the fight 30-27 in favor of Machida.[48] UFC promoter Dana White stated shortly after the fight that he had Machida winning all three rounds,[49] and later told Yahoo! Sports that ""Machida definitely won"" and ""MMA judging sucks"".[50] Fightmetric Analysis shows Davis struck machida more times. [51] ESPN released a similar analysis tracking each fighter's activity in each category, and reporting the 29-28 victory scored by the three judges at ringside.[52].77.101.41.108 "

Some ratings from the VCHip 1. The Power: TV-PG-L (hell, shit, pissed) 2. Just Set Up the Chairs: TV-PG-V (the Destroyer of World murders) 3. Caffeinated Concert Tickets: TV-PG-D (lady pecs = boobs, real reason people go to concerts is too see hot girls) 4. Death Punchies: TV-PG-V: (death kwon do, Rigby's bare ass) 5. Free Cake: TV-PG-L: (pissed) 6. Meat Your Maker: TV-PG-L-V (pissed, cannibalistic hot dogs) 7. Grilled Cheese Deluxe: TV-PG (purple nurple, suggestive touching) 8. The Unicorns Got to Go: TV-PG-D-V (lady flashbacks, risque goth lady, eating crotch balls, attack of the unicorns) 9. Prank Callers: TV-PG (brain tumor) 10. Don: TV-PG-D (Don reveals all the characters are naked, sugar seems gay) 11. Rigby's Body: TV-PG-L (sucks, turds) 12. Mordecai and the Rigbys: TV-PG (crotch humps) 13. Ello Govnor: TV-PG-V (evil taxi) 14. It's Time: TV-PG-D (Rigby tongue-kissing Margaret, discussing how good movies have sex) 15. Appreciation Day: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 16. Peeps: TV-PG (implied naked Pops) 17. Dizzy: TV-PG (implied naked Pops) 18. My Mom: TV-PG-D (my mom jokes imply sex) 19. High Score: TV-PG (GBF kicked in the crotch) 20. Rage Against the TV: TV-PG-V (kick him in the junk, Hammer's killings) 21. Party Pete: TV-14-D (guests with breasts line, breast zoom-ins, sexual dancing with Pops, Pete's groin lump shown) 22. Brain Eraser: TV-14 (naked Pops seen throughout whole episode, implied long penis scene, junk) 23. Benson Be Gone: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 24. But I Have a Receipt: TV-PG-V (the stabbing) 25. This is My Jam: TV-PG (gutters, crotch humps) 26. Muscle Woman: TV-14-D-S (junk, tongue-kiss, big breasted Starla) 27. Temp Check: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 28. Jinx: TV-PG-V (Jinx monsters attack, NSFW remark on dirty raccoon, naked people) 29. See You There: TV-PG (nothing wrong) 30. Do Me a Solid: TV-PG (shake weight) 31. Grave Sights: TV-PG-V (zombies) 32. Really Real Wrestling: TV-PG-V (wrestlers) 33. Over the Top: TV-PG-V (Rigby's death) 34. The Night Owl: TV-PG-D (second base 35. A Bunch of Baby Ducks: TV-PG 36. More Smarter: TV-PG 37. First Day: TV-PG 38. Go Viral: TV-PG (panties) 39. Skunked: TV-PG 40. Karaoke Show: TV-PG 41. Stick Hockey: TV-PG (chinese man named Chong, like ching chong 42. Bet to Be Blonde: TV-PG (blonde stereotypes)

You suppose to keep your hoes from finding out about each other

Just to let you know My edits are not vandalism because it talks about how many professional wins does each player have. The (3) indicates that the player has three wins, and you can see the list of victories below the headings of the wins section.

POV template added... ... because of the introduction of this photo montage, which consists of a collage of different propaganda pictures

Spider-man:Web of shadows he is in this game heres proof .

Re Northridge It appears that content about Northridge is being censored I have been very careful to document and to state as neutrally as possible. You seem knowlegable and your thoughts appreicated.

I am unable to state so on the user page of that account, or anywhere else, because of these blocks. I do not know why an administrator thinks the user account belongs to me. I was never even informed that it had been created.

Yall letting these hoes fuck you with the strap after you said no?

Why am I even talking to this retard, who hasn't ever gotten out of his chair since he was born?

Stuff like that is often a remnant of ye olden days of Wikipedia, when there was far fewer rules and far, far fewer people roaming about looking for opportunities to enforce them.

i want to speak to the manager. Do you... do you own Wikipedia now, sir Thomas? I hate you, you have no say in what I have say to the world on Wikipedia. I see your true colors, Tommy, they're ugly and gay. Like you.

" Find a reliable source for it, then it can be added to this article and/or the one about Anthology. But we don't do anything without sources. '''''' TalkContribs "

Please note, Qing Dynasty wasn't Chinese Dynasty and Korea declared Empire prior to illegal Japanese treaties. Therefore Japanese version of Sino-Japanese war and other facts are fully fabricated by Japanese imperialists, therefore Sammyy85 edit is not valid.Korsentry

Netball video Not beautiful but video. I have higher quality but it doesn't appear to want to upload. If you want to try to include in the relevant article, awesome sauce. )

You don't know if it's a fraud or not. Let's assume there is some plagiarism. The plagiarism referred in the article is miniscule. Consider the following example: I write 10 equations and claim to be my work. If 9/10 are stolen equations, it doesn't mean all my work is fraudulent. I still have 1 original equation. But of course, you're using circular logic. You cant possibly understand...

" Well, thank you for spouting your ignorant mouth off, moron who can't read policies. You're obviously a foolish anti-semite, since you didn't bother taking any time to read that ridiculous ""marwenmedia"" site that was linked up as ""proof."" Go find something useful to do now, please, and stop trying to insert your racism into an encyclopedia."

" New project for me Originally, I was going to write about Chicago mass transit because of a red link but I found out that there's already a good article on it by a slightly different name. Thanks for the link. I am going to write about Newton Minow, who has quite an interesting background. He is in Chicago. He's the Honorary Counsel General of Singapore to Chicago, has quite a law background, and headed the Federal Communications Commission at one time where he coined the term ""vast wasteland"" for TV. Nothing for you to do but it's my foray into Chicago related topics! "

Sir, I compel you to treat me with good faith, and to cease this path of bigotry and condemnation you currently persue. I only want us to be capable of working together, and I will not stop until you submit - either through charity or shame - to my peaceful overtures. 86.40.207.29

Investigation This is Chris Hansen with Dateline NBC. I'm doing an investiagtion regarding internet predators on Wikipedia. If there is anything you would like to say, then you are free to reply.

Mikkalai, I'm glad you got that email. I only asked if you got it because I was not totally sure if I had sent it right.

I'll have to stop by, but likely when it comes time to close the review (if I review and support, that means two delegates are out of action for that nomination). Thank you very much, again! —

I can't believe I'm the first person posting here! Well, it's nice of you to delete the page you had dedicated to me. Alas, you still failed to find out where are the subtle edits made. Tsk tsk.218.186.13.2 Oh ya. Can't believe we're both online at the same time. 218.186.13.2 Care to talk? 218.186.13.2

The version I just examined appears to have removed the considerable number of personal attacks and there is a citation that backs up the assertions of criminal charges, so I'm going to restore the article under its correct name and remove the week's worth of protection that I applied to forestall further attacks. As you will doubtless realize, Wikipedia has to be extremely careful about publishing anything that amounts to criminal libel, and the first two versions of the article I examined were undoubtedly libellous. Thanks for attempting to work within our boundaries. talk

@ICBC_World214 @FreeBlizz_ICBC bitch bought her son some talking bout I had to get em before they sold out

No sources; no evidence this is anything save Original Research, for which we are not designed. PMAnderson

" Barnstar Great work with all your user templates to make them more welcoming...... The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar I award you this barnstar for helping to make user templates far more friednly and your work on WP:RFCN to fight for the newbies See the mess I've created or let's have banter "

Racist? Are you crazy? I thought that you were off of my ass already? What did I write that was 'racist?' Have you actually read the other crap that I posted in? Where is the block on them? Now THOSE comments are racist. The articles themselves are racist. The article was about RACE, so what else would someone write about? USE YOUR BRAIN WOMAN! Don't be so quick to use your 'blocking powers' just because you don't like what I write. Also, stop watching ME. I am getting tired of posting comments worrying about the usual clowns on my ass (the others have left me alone for a change, so I was shokced to see you again!) and here you come again. Maybe you need to READ what I post instead of just trying to block someone because don't like what they wrote. I wrote nothing offensive and it was in response to the article and other responses. Maybe you are one of those 'white' hispanics and you don't like anyone calling you anything but white? Wise up!

AfD warning It looks as if other people trying to show you were you are going wrong haven't had any success, so I'll make it clear: if you continue to nominate articles for deletion which are about notable subjects (as established after spending some effort on Google searches), you will be blocked. Not every AfD needs to be successful, many of my AfDs end in keep or no consensus. But starting an AfD for lack of notability without doing any effort to find sources yourself is against policies and guidelines, and continuing to do so after it has been explained to you is disruptive. Speedy deletion criteria have nothing to do with this, and don't apply to films and so on anyway; but note that e.g. a record can only be speedy deleted if the musician or band are a redlink: similarly, we wouldn't speedy delete a film article where the main actors are bluelinks even if we had a speedy criterion for films.

The dangling semi occured in 1997, The driver, an Elyrian Woman, was unhurt but she shit her pants.......

When you and your boys discover a hoe

...you're white, aren't you? *rolls eyes* @DreaaaLove RIP to my NIGGA Trayvon, a worthless spear chucker

2005 (UTC) No again. Reference frame discussions are germane to the biblical arguments. 08:02, 1 Apr

It also mentions that stories about Ganesha can be found in the Puranas.

Fluffernutter, Drmies, Bilby, Source: Please note that my other criticism of the article is also valid, i.e. that it is unbalanced, that it fails to mention Mees columns and international publications, and that it trip over the descriptions of Mees' views on women's issues.

Attention please! this page does not belong to indon barbarian.. Shah

@NasshRodriguez @linndaroose always down patty never been a pussy 😼

"Welcome Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Email sender accreditation, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: Policy on neutral point of view Guideline on spam Guideline on external links Guideline on conflict of interest If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page and how to develop articles Help pages Tutorial Article wizard for creating new articles Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of User talk:SuperMarioManmy talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! MarioMan "

" It's not so easy, I do it as good I can, but thank you for notifying me. I promise to be more careful with the numbers from now on. /Mid (contributions) "

Edit* I didn't apolagize Merope, it was another woman Crimesone, anyway its the same thing, you apolagize to one woman you've apologized to the whole of womankind.

"==Request for Usurpation== Hello, Zsuetam. A request has been made at Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations to usurp, or ""take over"", your username because you have not used it to edit, and another user would like to use it to edit. Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations says that any unused username may be usurped if the user is given an opportunity to object and does not do so. If you have an email set in your preferences, you should be getting an email from a bureaucrat or changing username clerk explaining how to consent or object to this process. If you do not object to being renamed to a new username in order for another user to use the name you currently have, please log in and post a reply here saying so (you may also tell us what username you would like to be renamed to, or we will provide you with a generic one). If you do nothing: the request may be filled shortly, and your account will be moved to a generic username. You may request that it be moved to a new username of your choice at any time. If you object to being renamed: please log in and make an edit to this page clearly stating that you object to usurpation. Please note that even if your current username is usurped, you can still edit and your data will not be lost; your preferences, watchlist, and other user settings will be transferred to a new username. Thank you for your time. –xenotalk "

Also see:

Wen yu see uh bad bitch n wanna holla say Ayyy

" An entry from appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 17 September, 2006. "

Please check the Music_intervals_frequency_ratio_equal_tempered_pythagorean_comparison file Can some folks in the know please check the graph embedded in the present article Cent_%28music%29#Use for accuracy? It seems to me as that it does not agree with the table at with Pythagorean_tuning#Method.

3 reverts = block. What are you protesting?

" First, you excuse your attack and are critical of my comments? ""Bullshit vs. 12 year old"" is unequal in that your remark suggests the entire thought process of another person is to be regarded as equal to that which a male cow excretes, where as the other remark suggests the thoughts as having come from someone much younger. Is that Harsh or something more? Second, I cited the indiviual and suggested that you re-read the article for proof but since you are too lazy here is the opening sentense. ""According to the founding member James H, Fetzer..."" article overview here. Third, that the KKK thinks blacks inferior is a fact of the group and is stated in the opening sentence of their Wiki. ""Ku Klux Klan (KKK) is the name of a number of past and present fraternal organizations in the United States that have advocated white supremacy"". White Supremacy implies blacks and any non-white has lesser intellect and are less human and I have not sought to change or soften that definition. You seem to forget that this is what they are and what they beleive. It does not matter if I take offense or disagree because it is the truth. Likewise, the group ""Scholars for 9/11 Truth"" was founded by James H, Fetzer and I cited his definition of the organization in the overview. You have no legitimate basis for removing that regardless of your opinion. Are you rushing over to the Klan article right now to make it less offensive to blacks? OH, why not? Because you know full well that it represents the truth and your thoughts on the matter are not relevant? Ok, now you get it. If you revert this article again, I will first go to the KKK site and look for similar ""cleansing"" and if you have not done it, I will come back here and revert this back to the truth. BTW, I know you are not a Marine, I was being sarcastic. If you were a Marine, your sorry but would be off in Iraq defending James H, Fetzer's right to say what he wants... and bringing your flavor of democracy to a group of people who clearly are need of it. "

Unlike most people at Wiki who hide behind their IP addresses, for whatever reasons, we at 60.224.64.166 have nothing to hide. Being accused of suckpuppetry without our right to defend, is scandalous. People in a democratic society are considered innocent of any accusation until proven guilty. How about seeking facts before convicting? The sharing of an IP address is obviously a crime at Wiki ... it's much like shoot first and ask questions later! Thanks Wiki! 60.224.64.166

It's a bird...It's a plane...It's SuperManu NBASuperHeroes

When creating a definition that effectively conveys information, we can't eliminate things that condemn ourselves. I realize that self-incrimination goes against human nature, but we can resolve the discrepancy by taking incrimination out of our definitions. Terrorism, for instance, doesn't have to be pejorative. We can talk about it simply as a method of war or influence. If terrorism isn't evil, then it doesn't matter if Israel includes terrorism as one of its tactics. You may think that stripping any implication of terrorism from Israel is good for the Jewish people, but let's look at the big picture. In the information age, we can no longer keep people from researching historical data. Trying to subvert this information only serves to show the bias of those attempts. With unrestricted global communication, manipulation of mass communication is passé. I believe I can make a case for it never having been a good thing, but that is beside the point. Regardless of whether it was ever good to suppress and change history, one thing is certain: it is increasingly harder to do so.

Deleting the article would very improper on your part. Doing so would obviously be an act againist freedom of speech. The articles quotes references, they are in bold type. Deleting would only reveal your bias and fears. There are articles on criticism of many books, but when you do about the talmud, I Jew am accused of being anti-Semite, disgusting. It's not in an essay form, it lists many, many references including profession books, websites, and quotations from books, and Jewish scholars. It is in point form to help make adjustment. I now have a copy of the article so don't think about about trying to delete it I and others will just put back on! It's call presenting different side, or againist that freedom too?

" OK, I'll redirect it for you. (talk contributions) "

"Dad say hi to my snapchat" Dad "✌️✌️ duces bitch" 😂😂😩😩

Citation Needed on Faustus Hi Stratpod. Nice job of cleaning up on The Tragical History of Doctor Faustus! It's nice to see someone take an interest in these articles. Just wanted to let you know that the citation needed marking needs to be inserted in articles using the template (a convenient shortcut that produces the same result is ). Like other wikicode and templates this will be expanded, when you save the page, to the superscripted “citation needed” text as well as—and this is the crucial bit—adding the article to a hidden maintenance category. When you simply insert the text “citation needed” and format it the article won't be added to that category and it'll be harder for other editors to find it. Anyways, just wanted to let you know about the templates and say thanks for the cleanup on `Faustus.

" Sorry, had a grumpy time this afternoon. What this about the findings of the courts must be treated as fact? Does this mean that we know for sure that the court ruled a certain way? Or that whatever the court rules as true is some sort of super-POV which is considered to be ""objectively so"", rather than ""a recent US court ruling""?"

}} {{notice|This editor is accepting requests for help with copy-editing articles. Please make yourself known below.

" November 2010 (UTC) CS, if you give me (or one of my Talk Page Stalkers) permission, we can just copy some of the basic parts to your Archive subpage and your talk page, to get you going. Then you will just need to change the image. I have the search tool on my userpage because I don't know how to add it elsewhere I'm not that good at this stuff, set mine up by copying other people. (Talk) 13:07, 14"

Islam-bashing on Wikipedia Hi. I noticed your edits on the Zionism page. There's a pretty well-organized group (groups?) of people here who seek to defame Islam every chance they get. This is being done by whitewashing Muslim contributions in history, presenting less-than-credible arguements from partisan sources aimed at generalizing Muslims, etc. I hope I can ask you to help if there's a conflict with some of these articles. If you're familiar with other Muslims here, tell them to keep an eye out for this kind of defamatory content. If you need my help with any article pertaining to Islam or Muslims, I'd be glad to help if it's in my power to do so. Thanks.

What is this, admins, swooping down and gang banging me just because it helps build your wiki juice. Just because I ask the all political biographies to use the same tone, style, general treatment as the Obama bio? I wanted all the bios to be EQUALLY teated and I GET BANNED AND SLAPPED down by the DCCC LOVERS. The process is fundamentally unfair and stink of a kangaroo court. This just plain railroading... kafka pure and simple. WIKPEIDA IS FUNDAMENTALLY in regards to political biographies and other political subjects, bias and pro liberal. SO BE IT but I, as a US citizen, I don't' have to see Wikipeida enjoy tax exempt status. You can BLOG all you want, but the US tax payer dont' have to pay. SO, WTG you now have I will be filling out a IRS compliant form which will challenges WIKI non-profit status under rule 501 (c) (3). I will state there fundamental political bias (see IRS Complaint Process here and form Form 13909}} any cursory review of Barak Obama's and other democratic biographies and compare them to corresponding republican bios, and there will be uncover a fundamental bias,which will cause the IRS to look closly at wikipeida. Now, this wiki account is now dead, dead of wiki hatred of republicans. Time to unite, as Republicans, and KILL WIKIPEDIA!!!

Niggas don't mind sharing hoes

" Stone Censors I don’t know that I’m wrong; in fact, I’m quite certain that you and AuburnPilot are in the wrong. You can censor me and block me all you want – you’ve got the power – but you can’t make me confess to wrongs of which I am innocent. Not yet, anyway. And you can’t make me say that you’re right, when you are as wrong as hell. It’s about time somebody talked back to you. “If you were to discuss your edits, you won't [sic] be in this position right now.” (Since I had already discussed my edits, physicq’s statement above is a case of “a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.”) That’s funny peculiar, because wikicensors with the correct politics somehow never have to “discuss” their “edits.” They just go and censor people with whom they disagree, and then demand that the censees justify the worth of the censored passages or links or footnotes. And guess what? The censees’ explanations, no matter how well-founded and eloquent, are never sufficient to make the censors change their minds. Once an editor realizes that nothing he says will have any positive effect on the censors (or should I say, ""commissars""?), he would be a fool to waste his time and energy trying to change that which cannot be changed. That the censors continue demanding such arguments is because they have a sadistic glee for wasting other people’s precious time and energy. In case an open-minded (but perhaps less experienced) reader should suspect that I am just engaging in bluster, I had already made my argument in my previous entry on this page (which AuburnPilot has archived in a handsome tan box at the bottom of User_talk:AuburnPilot under the uncivil category, “spam”) for why the footnotes and links I inserted were legitimate, but physicq aka physicq210 derided those arguments as a “polemic, complete with fallacious personal attacks,” and mocked my criticism of his abuse of authority as “whining.” In one case, I pointed out that the external link that AuburnPilot defamed as “spam” and censored, was a classic magazine article related to the Racial Profiling Hoax. (Speaking of which, Wikipedia's Racial profiling article is hopelessly POV through the censors’ deleting of links to articles debunking the hoax, and inserting of links to fraudulent “literature” such as thoroughly debunked work by the ACLU.) In the case of a footnote that AuburnPilot also defamed as “spam” and censored, he cut the longest, most thorough exposé yet published on the Duke Rape Hoax, which was published by the most brilliant, reliable magazine on the Web, VDARE. BTW, AuburnPilot asserts that the sources in question are not “reliable” or “verifiable,” and do not maintain “neutrality.” Aside from the fact that thousands of Wikipedia articles are transparent political propaganda, or no more than love or hate letters to certain public figures (particularly entertainers or athletes), AuburnPilot has misrepresented the Wikipedia rule on neutrality. There is no requirement that every source be neutral (as opposed to reliable and verifiable), only that every Wikipedia article be neutral. WP:NPOV “All Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), representing fairly and without bias all significant views that have been published by a reliable source. For guidance on how to make an article conform to the neutral point of view, see the NPOV tutorial.” As for “verifiablilty,” the VDARE source has over 100 hyperlinks to supporting documentation from newspapers, magazines, TV and radio news organizations, and legal filings; if that isn’t “verifiable,” then nothing is. Now, I ask you. If I have already made my best argument for including the aforementioned links and footnotes, and physicq aka physicq210 responds by misrepresenting what I said, claiming that I have made no attempt at supporting my position, and referring to my defense as “whining,” what possible reason could I have for continuing such a charade? Plus, why should I be on the defensive? If I were dealing with fair, reasonable people, that might make sense. But fair, reasonable people would not do as AuburnPilot did, and first censor my edits, and then demand I justify their value on the talk pages. (And physicq would not have responded to an edit war by throwing in with AuburnPilot, immediately blocking me, and charging me with “disruptive edits.” That alone is proof of physicq’s unfitness as an administrator.) No, AuburnPilot would not have censored my work, but would have asked me on the talk page why I thought it belonged. No, strike that. He would have hit the links and read the articles in question. If th

Dave, if you check contributors, you will see that I have edited Europe quite a bit. (I also helped modify the clickable map.) There are periodic problems with the clickable map because of transcontinental countries. People from there often want to be wholly in Europe or sometimes people want to deny Eastern Thrace is in Europe, etc. This affects also the table for the countries. But despite problems from a small number of nationalist editors (some of whom are the socks of the same editor Polgraf), the map and table seem popular. I put Asia on my watchlist when, as ComtessedeMingrelie, Polgraf was targeting Europe. Asia and the Europe and the Seas map template. I am surprised how little there is in the article on Asia which is now a third of the size of Europe.

Removal of sourced content Re List of new religious movement and cult researchers You are removing sourced content and vandalizing the page.If you do not understand the criteria for inclusion on a list don't edit the page. You're supposed to be an experienced editor - act like one. Thanks

It was the disdain of the more power-hungry admins for ordinary contributors and the unwillingness of Arbcom (made up, of course, largely of power-hungry admins) to reign them in that made me stop writing stuff for WP. I haven't posted anything under my user name for well over a year now. I have, however, made a few posts to discussions where admin abuse was visible. A certain HJ Mitchell (now where have I seen that user name recently?) blocked me for posting whilst logged out. This, of course, is not a legitimate reason. And someone from the block-first-think-second-but-only-if-you-can-be-bothered school blocked me for being User:Vigilant despite my editing from a static IP in a different country from where Vigilant lives. This site lets people like Mitchell climb the greasy pole through picking on others. (Just look at his activity log and how few of the people he has blocked have blue user talk page links and they aren't all vandals. WP:BITE or what?) Hopefully his plans to get on Arbcom have been pushed back somewhat by this latest escapade.

", 2 June 2011 (UTC) ""Any edit I make that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus."" By your own definition, the changes to the lead did not have consensus as they were reverted by at least two editors. ''''''chatspy 17:54"

"::""Loathing"" is your word, not mine; I merely referred to whether or not it is a reliable source. As for your point, I am usually one to call others to task for invoking WP:BLP, but I think it applies in this case. We are always bound by WP:V as one of the five pillars of Wikipedia, but when what we are writing is potentially legally actionable against the Wikipedia Foundation, there is an urgency attached as well. My judgment was that the edit in question could not stay as it was written, with only the Post as a ""source"". I stand by that judgment. Nothing prevents a willing colleague from re-adding information...after a suitable source is found.    talk  "

"::::*The name of the geographical reference isn't really pertinent to this discussion, but rather the name of the subject of the article itself. ARTEST4ECHO has supplied ample evidence that the building's official name as presented on church documents includes ""The"" as part of the name. As I pointed out in the previous discussion it's not our place to proofread or correct errors that the church may have made in the naming of this temple, nor is it our place to truncate part of the name because we feel it fits in a little better with the rest of them. eth "

Legally printing an image of a banknote? Is it illegal to print an image of a banknote provided that you use it for display rather than to actually purchase things? Do film studios have to have some sort of special procedure for using fake money in films? Do the notes have to have a special marker on them? 128.243.253.114

I've given up on resolving disputes with those people. Frankly, resolution is not possible. All you have to do is look into his contributions to see an obvious pattern of vandalism. It does not take an expert on the subject to figure out what's going on there. What you don't seem unable or unwilling to understand is why those users are editing articles on Wikipedia in the first place. There are two possibilities... i) You don't have a history with these guys. or ii) You are involved in the same activities. You have made it quite clear where you stand though. You are as guilty as they are of corrupting the integrity of those articles, whether it is intentional or not. Have a good day.

💃💃 & if you ain't a ho get up out my trap hooouseee.

Violent crime is escalating in the Atlantic coastal regions and the Corn Islands, and the Nicaraguan National Police do not have the resources to combat it. The U.S. Embassy in Managua has received reports of numerous crimes against residents and tourists in the region and now prohibits personnel from traveling to the area, with limited exceptions. there is my source

Assumptions again huh, my admin friend? It shouldn't be this easy to accuse people of cheating - well, who am I talking to? Just for completeness, I don't know this person, and I haven't looked at or edited anything in wikipedia since you have threatened me. And be happy, you will never see me again, so you can keep wikipedia free from any fact you don't like.

That's really really unlikely - studios like control, there is no control in this action and it would lead them open to legal action from their investors and marvel (who get a percentage). From the BBC article, it appears it was leaked from the company doing the effects.

“@butter_obama: I hate when I attempt to make the yellow light but the car infront of me stops at the light 😡😡😡”‼️ I be wanting to fight😂

" The part of 2 & 3 I don't follow is that in the wikipedia article it specifically states that the MWI explains the fine-tuned universe which refers to physical constants changing. Which is ofcourse a blatantly inaccurate foolish statement. The MWI does not explain the fine-tuned universe as listed. The statement made says that the MWI ""may provide an explanation for the fine-tuned universe"" which is obviously false and inaccurate. Do you know what a fine-tuned universe means or refers to? It's no wonder wikiepdia's accuracy is known as laughable with the most unnaturally foolish wiki editors141.156.133.161 "

Nice work I did a little work on the tone the article is full of useful info, just needs to keep an appropriate tone and cite all sources.

" The name Lek The name ""Lek"" stands for Alexander in Albanian. Some ""coin"" experts believe this means ""Alexander The Great"" the national hero of Macedonia (a nearby and competing country) that fought against and conquered Albania in the 4th century BC. ""Lord Alexander"" also known as ""Iskender Beg"" and ""Skanderbeg"" was the national hero of Albania. Lord Alexander who's real name was Gjergj Kastrioti, led the resistance against the Turks during the 15th century and this was the only time Albania was independent from the 4th century BC until 1912 AD. Naming the Lek after Lord Alexander is a fitting tribute. Lord Alexanders portrait also appears on several Lek banknotes.Manlord II"

Please note that I put forward four bullet points above. While I believe that mention of Proposition 8 should be accompanied by both explanations in as brief a form as possible, I would agree that it would be equitable, though not optimal, to simply remove any further description of Prop 8 from this article as I mentioned in my fourth point. The current description is not impartial to differing views on the measure.

" In Wikipedia any claims must be supported by sources. The interpretation of ""most"" is not explicitly stated in the BBC citation, but it is consistent with the following paragraphs in the United Kingdom section. (It would be better if there were a direct source for the statement at the end of that sentence.) The statement ""but the use of kilogrammes is increasing"" is supported by the Guardian article. So both statements should be restored. I will revert the changes. "

don't trim please don't trim article on personal manners

" The list of 143 enumerated by George Olshevsky is complete. I've just focused on a few more common ones. I have an incomplete list, but all the pure reflectional ones at "

Going hard bitch swear I'm on my job throw a quake in the air call that shit a lob

" You are welcome for the help, but I warned you about continuing to edit war at Hansen Site. I've made a 3RR report . '''iro''' "

" I couldn't give a fuck what you think really. talk "

Hi to all, I am Jim.I'm a lout.

" The thing is, if the words ""India rubber"" are given a piped link, the user will be taken directly to a page titled ""Natural rubber"", which might confuse them, but if the words ""India rubber"" are linked as they stand, the user will be taken to the same page, but additionally bearing the text (Redirected from ) which explains why they were taken there. It is indeed unlikely that India rubber will ever be a separate article from Natural rubber; but that's not a reason in itself. "

" Unspecified source for Image:HenryBEyring.jpg Thanks for uploading Image:HenryBEyring.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ≈talk "

I actually just hate the bitches on here

I think the best analogy for this kind of copying is our article on Star Wars opening crawl. We don't include an actual reprint of the text. We include whatever information there is around the text. We might even summarize the text, but we don't repeat the text, not even with a word or two changed. That's how we cover something encyclopedically without getting into copyright issues. Admittedly there is some stuff written about the Narnia timeline. I don't think it's enough to warrant an article, and I don't think it justifies copyright violation. I'm interested to see what a resident copyright expert would say though.

Nun but bad bitches link up tonight MansionElan finna go crazy

Professional Wikipedia bureaucrats like you and the ignorant busybody who reported me are precisely what's wrong with this site today and one of the major reasons why few people around the world have any faith in the accuracy of Wikipedia articles. Knowledgeable, productive editors like me are persecuted by know-nothings who are more expert at taking advantage of WP's byzantine bureaucracy than any particular field of study. Congratulations on making this site that much worse.

I Would like this account closed by any able body, My new account will be adjusted and kept with a secure password.