Datasets:

tarekziade

/

profanity

like 2

First flight The Caproni Ca.5 used in the first flight under the Brooklyn Bridge was NOT the world's biggest airplane even at the time the Vickers Vimy was bigger, and so was the Handley Page O/400. I've changed the text to reflect this fact. 24.5.122.13

this seems a good starting point:

@Ronnie2K not just @Pharrell gave 2k a trash non-basketball soundtrack, y'all still have problems with servers 😒

Where does ATP as a regular of the activity of enzymes and other proteins fit in?

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did at User talk:Donner60, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 77.53.219.2

Silver Badge Party A few months ago you mentioned that this article contained major inaccuracies. Would you be able to help correct some of them, or give me some guidance on what they are? thanks, talk

" I changed ""he was probably Persian"" to ""most sources identify him as being Persian"" - both still do not state ""he was Persian"", which would be POV. Cheers, "

" DYK Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Silent All These Years, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ""Did you know?"" talk page."

@JunDishes amen little mama. y does this old southern country bitch like you so much I don't know. but I do!

Wow! That was fast. I'm impressed.

I have noticed that some of the anatomy articles that have been nominated for GA have some content that in my opinion is amateurish, and I have good reasons for saying that.

I'm amused that you're unable to see the difference between peer-reviewed published material in major journals, opinion establishing how the field is received, and the respective uses to which these might be put. The piece in Nature India is an excellent source for the fact that CF is a pariah field in the US, and to support the fact that a few individuals are nonetheless pursuing the field, but it completely fails to establish any kind of resurgence of CF research, since it's a news piece not a published paper. Guy ()

Hey, just wanted to thank you for your amazing efforts to keep the discussion page civil, organized, and coherent. Your efforts have meant a lot to me, especially when saner heads need to prevail and I get the urge to smash something or bang my head against the wall ;)

WARNING: Future Perfecta at Sunrise IS A MEMBER OF THE WIKIPEDIAN GREEK NATIONALISTIC JUNTA. By User:Balkan There’s a well collaborated (London based) group of GREEK Wikipedia sysops/users that has been spotted to work systematically in full daily basis propagandazing ultra natioanalistic Greek POV, and distorting related articles. They intervene in any Balkan history and politics related article, pushing Greek POV, launch edit wars, and repeated reverts of vandalized by them versions, permanent deletions, block users, merges and redirects to deletetion of undesired new articles. Their main target is to distort all articles lelated to ISLAM, TURKEY, REBUBLIC OF MACEDONIA, BULGARIA, ALBANIA (CHAMERIA), THEIR MINORITIES IN GREECE AND THEIR HISTORY. They attack every article criticizing Greece transforming it to Greekish propaganda POV. They became maniacs in optimizing dark side of Greek history.They communicate each other by secret e-mails avoiding messages through their talk pages to avoid publicity. This group acting in a systematic way to revert articles, when one of member makes the limit of 3 reverts, one another continues with 4th revert to avoid punishment for violating 3rv rule. Furthermore they are suspected agents of Greek National Intelligence Service (E.Y.Π. Κυπατζήδες) and believers of ultra nationalistic organizations of Greek “national interests”, as L.A.O.S. and Chrissi Avgi. They are also multiple sockpuppets and impersonators of their group members. They are all schizophrenics web vandals unacceptible to wikipedian community. Balkan history has labelled such people as GREKOMANS, a form of mental malignacy cited in Larousse dictionaries. Their illusion is MEGALI IDEA of Greek nationalism-expandism.They have been allied with Armenian, Serbian and Cypriot extremists of similar interest. THEY HAVE CONSTITUTED A WIKIPEDIAN GUNG, A GREEK PRAPAGANDA LOBBY, A GREEK EPSILON TEAM. All member of group are very radical nationalists. They work continously in three shifts over day and night. To verify chek their contributions, talk page, edits, deletions, blocks, directs, protected pages and act properly. Wikipedia isn’t the right place to propagandize for “God’s elit nations” as Greece. Members of gang involves: user:Khoikhoi sysop , He’s the chief-manager of group, recently probated by Wikipedia, suspected sockpuppet or impersonator of user:Future Perfect at Sunrise and suspected agent of Greek intelligence user:Future Perfect at Sunrise GREEK, (sysop), chief-manager of group, suspected sockpuppet or impersonator of user:Khoikhoi and suspected agent of Greek intelligence user:Aldux (sysop), ), close collaborator of user:Khoikhoi user:Tekleni GREEK ,confirmed multiple sock puppet user:Telex,GREEK, confirmed sock puppet user:NikoSilver GREEK, close collaborator of user:Euthymios, vassal of user:Khoikhoi and user:Future Perfect at Sunrise user:Euthymios GREEK, confirmed collaborator of user:Khoikhoi and user:Future Perfect at Sunrise user:Hectorian GREEK user:Politis, GREEK user: AndreasJS GREEK, close collaporator of user:Khoikhoi and user:Aldux user:Miskin,GREEK user:mitsos GREEK

However the one revert restriction prevents me from doing so.

what the structure of the Lutheran church is

" notability and sourcing Dear 74 thank you for your answer. I really appreciate the way you propose to communicate as it gives more comfort for both of us and builds dialog and consensus. Thank you for your suggestions on how to improve this article. I agree with them but I think I should first follow Fiddle Faddle's suggestion ""that the first task is to show and prove notability though"" I fully understand and agree with wikipedia rules - thanks to which the quality of articles is high and I want to follow that. This is why I prepared (it took a lot of my time - believe me) a detailed info proving notability and the fact that I mostly use secondary sources (It's available here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SORCER). Unfortunately, till now from those who have doubts on notability and sources - there was no single comment showing directly what in their opinion is not enough within presented proves. So as I appreciate our way of communication I would like to ask you for your opinion about the proves of notability and sourcing which I have provided here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SORCER. I encourage you to read all of it but if you would like to focus on proves only - they are listed with following dates/signatures: Pawelpacewicz (talk) Pawelpacewicz (talk) Additionally in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SORCER you can find opinions of 2 members who are specializing in computing: User:Scope creep who is member of WikiProject Computer science. He reviewed one of sources and confirmed it's secondary source User:W Nowicki who is member of WikiProject Computing - gave ""keep"" vote I hope You find them useful. "

thx4thx Thanks Tim, I am looking for someone who will look after my one nomination for the day as I cannot process my own work. If you have time then all help appreciated but deleting or moving my hook in particular would assist me in moving forward the process?

Revert Reverted one step due to vandalism;

Sitush , I am a wind up merchant because I dont know how to indent ? Dont be so angry ,honestly please teach me the right way to indent . We can all learn .Sitush Your scholarship is remarkable and Ive said it earlier , but you need to learn how to accept that while you may know what others don't ,others may know what you don't , when you turn articles on their head along with your team ,browbeat other editors together , with patently imbalanced content and unfairly bringing down everything in the article ( really the other side of the bigging up coin ) , then be prepared for your content to be confronted . Cheers

" I do believe it is in the best interest of the reader that all articles are justified and does not ""gum up the works."" In any case, I also believe it's rude to demand things of someone you do not know, especially when there is no official policy stating either case. I've combed through that summary multiple times, and I'm pretty sure it's a NPOV. The social impact of this movie is something to behold, and I think an encyclopedia needs to pay attention to that."

"] Page Contents On a more general note, should there really be a subheader for this particular case when it's the only entry under the ""AHBL In Court"" header? New links A new user added pages for several of the people and organizations associated with AHBL. When I followed the links, there wasn't a lot of content available. I removed the leetspeak with extreme prejudice (hopefully the newbie doesn't read edit summaries, lest he feel bitten), and I added what I know, but what I know is basically limited to what I've read about the lawsuit. Those of you who are more familiar with the people involved and in some cases appear to be the people involved might want to take a look and see if there's anything that needs to be added or deleted. (How does the subject of a bio adding information intereact with the Original research policy? Think about it.) I dont mind DCB4W ) I'm glad you're here because it looks like two parties are in conflict with eachother and they were the main contributors to this article. Note, someone just deleted the Brian J. Bruns article with no discussion, after Bruns kept blanking reference to this:

2009 (UTC) What is the relationship between this entry and the gestalt theory? They seem to cover much of the same ground. and then this bibliography under perception. 07:41, 18 May

" I wish you another six months of happy military mopping, more good times reading articles at WP:MHR and success with your own article writing. And hopefully another big period of growth for WP:MILHIST. '''' (vote in the photo straw poll'') "

HI MAN , DO YOU KNOW THAT U ARE stupid man

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to David Lindsay, 1st Earl of Crawford. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.

":::I appreciate that some people very strongly wish to maintain this fantasy, but that map shows regions as part of Serbia which are not actually part of Serbia. Please stop misleading readers. If you want a second map further down, which represents some hypothetical Serbian geography (ie, your interpretation of the constitution), rather than actual Serbian geography, then I could accept that as a compromise; but we must stop misleading readers. The map is not the only problem; I would point out that the lede says: This is blatantly false. Kosovo declared independence years ago. I already added the note Anastan. @Bobryner, feel free to read Template:Kosovo-note which says: ""Kosovo note was created with reference to the main wikipedia guidelines, like Wikipedia:NPOV, and Wikipedia:Naming conventions"". And what can be wrong here, Serbia officially have Kosovo as part of its territory. Its not ""hypothetical"" or ""interpretation of the constitution"", you go and read it your self now. Considering also that the Province of Kosovo and Metohija is an integral part of the territory of Serbia - Constitution of the Republic of Serbia So, we must use this map, as this is official, and its not fantasy. We all knaw that republika of Kosovo exist, but serbia official status is the same, so must use it until it is like that. (ταlκ) "

" A barnstar for you! The Technical Barnstar Thank you very much for  Vesey Joseph Kaipayil Per your decline at WP:RPP (which reassured me that I haven't gotten too easy at AfC -)), would you mind unsalting the page so it can be moved? I don't know who originally salted it, since the page history is only for the latest version. All the best, (talk) | chat _ Thanks! (talk) Do a Snotbot run I was wondering if Snotbot (great name) task #5 could be run on this and this. Sure, can do. | babble _ Running now. Once you see the bot activity stop, feel free to mark those categories as done. | yak _ Thank you Working on a new tool If you're interested, you can see an early version here. It allows you to perform arbitrary searches through the recent changes database. So, it helps with looking for particular types of edits that were recently made. Might be useful for vandal fighters. I still have some work to do on it, but it's working. Let me know if you have any comments or suggestions. I'll announce it more widely once it's more complete. | spill the beans _ Blocked Scottywong, I've blocked you for 24 hours. I appreciate you probably feel provoked, but this does not justify your comments. Now that's a unique outcome. Don't get me wrong, I don't disagree that what I said is a blockable offense, I just wonder why when a different editor says the exact same phrase and someone complains, the complainant gets told to shut the fuck up and do something useful, and stop trying to be the civility police. Was I using the phrase in a different context? I'm not looking for an unblock, I'm just looking for a formal acknowledgement that there is a double standard. For more info, see Wikipedia:ANI#Malleus_Fatuorum_and_Cornellier this ANI thread and this AN thread. I'd appreciate a response. | verbalize _ I'd imagine because it's a different admin who handled that dispute. I'd agree there's a total double standard here; all I can g

REDIRECT Talk:Divizia A 1919–20 (Cupa Harwester)

AFAIK they were not granted full independence - from some declassified State Department memos I was looking at, when Eric Williams tried to force the US to withdraw from its bases in Trinidad the British government re-assured the US that if Williams became too extreme in his demands they (the UK) could remove him from power. Since this was during the Federation (1960, if I remember correctly) I would infer that the Federation was not independent. Other than that I just have negative proof - that I have never heard of an independence ceremony (which, if it had happened would have been in Trinidad, since the Federal capital was there) and the fact that most of the islands reverted to being British possessions after dissolution.

" Yes, I do realize a lot of people made contributions to the article when I approached it. This is why I made a lot of effort to get other opinions on the rewrite and what the article should cover. See Talk:Sex#Rewrite of article, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biology#Sex, and Wikipedia talk:Version_1.0 Editorial Team/Core topics#Sex. No secret has been made of this rewrite—you can see how difficult it has been to get feedback. This article obviously had no ""steward"", as you so aptly describe on your userpage. I chose to become that steward when I proposed and made the rewrite. I would eventually like to take this core article to FA and it's been difficult to get any feedback. Perhaps you didn't realize it, but a ""see also"" section is deprecated, material should be covered within the body of the article. This came up during the Genetics FAC. I'm sorry your link got removed; I thought I had covered everything in the article. As I noted on the talk page, I think the article should have a top level section on evolution and I think this link could eventually go in there. I like you. I'm surprised, hurt, and disappointed that you're so quick to be angry with me. In my past experience (and up to now with the Sex article), I've been too hesitant to throw away old material and too slow to rewrite. Because I got no response to my proposal, and because the article was so poorly written, I went ahead and did it. Wikipedia encourages us to be bold. , who works on Gender, seemed happy with it. ✉ ✍ "

Could you amateurs please take some time to read a little more before making accusatory and inflamatory remarks? What about saying that the modern Jews are not actually descended of Abraham. How can you provbe that or that they originated from Judea. Prove that. I'm not arguing it but this getting very offensive. Assyrians were the original propogaters of the Aramaic language after Akkadian fell in to only elite usage. user:Abdel Masseekh

is this guy jewish? just wondering.

I travel the entire state, including the backroads, in connection with my work. There is little doubt that Anglo and African American Texas is solidly Southern in its culture. West Texas certainly has landscapes and habits that seem curious to those of us from the east of Interstate 35, but I find that the essential manners and mores of that region have little in common with western states such as Arizona or Colorado. East of Interstate 35 and north of San Antonio is where the vast population of the state is located. That regions accents, manners, race relations, food, dress, religion, history and folkways bind us solidly with our cousins to the east. South Texas is another matter. The population down there is majority hispanic and the question for the future will be how the immigrants down there assimilate with the rest of us and how much of their culture we adopt. For better or worse.

I love how we can marry and still be the same queer, messy, funny, fabulous, dramatic community we've always been. Why I love us.

Image source problem with Image:Om(band).JPG Thanks for uploading Image:Om(band).JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged. As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

My uncle taught me abt sex. He said 'The birds fuck the bees.' Then he told me he banged a girl so hard her freckles

Thank you. I hope this edit warring will not escalate any further. Greetings.

hey, why did you revert?

I am very busy now, but I do plan on a MASSIVE amount of writing on the Eva articles starting within the next 48 hours, equal to all of my previous work combined. This was just bad timing.

The criticisms are valid, as long as the article acknowledges where they are coming from, so people can judge validity themselves. At the moment, the article is overly vague imo - be clear that she's catholic, be clear that the criticisers are atheist, hindu, cultural critic or whoever they are. There is a vested interest and ignoring that has led to the objections to the article on the grounds of neutrality/bias, however you want to describe it.

That's right, these were not all under one movement, such as Dervish in the north, but they all had the same goal. Should we make a single article covering all of these and if there are major ones they will also obtain their own article?

your right i think, none of the states are Fischers because he is the subject in all of them

" FHU Editing Please explain to me how my editing of the Freed-Hardeman University page was biased and not neutral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs) "

I looked at the log file but I don't know why that was archived. I have increased the amount of log information that is kept; please let me know if this happens again. — Carl ( · talk)

Yes, that's precisely where much of the new material that's been added to this article has been drawn from. I do recommend it. It is more intended for general readers and as an introduction than the 1996 book as well, so probably more suitable for the encylopedia. And the Routledge series on great philosophers, is , I think very well regarded. I strongly recommend it.!!!

The vast majority of historians and notable genealogists, as well as the Smithsonian Institute and the Thomas Jefferson Memorial Foundation accept that the scientific as well as other temporal evidence demonstrates very strongly that Thomas Jefferson fathered Sally Hemings' children. You folks at the Monticello Association who cannot accept this, are showing a very ugly side of human disposition: snobbishness, stubbornness and willful stupidity. It's not very becoming for having descended from Thomas Jefferson.

Are you a self appointed mod or something?

" You're conflating issues here. This is not an assumption of bad faith; it's adhering to what the source actually says. William M. Connolley's extemporaneous comments here are not a source; the publication (RealClimate) is the source. This is just a frank evaluation of what the source says; RealClimate says nothing about who worked on the article or how it was written, but we know that unsigned ""group"" pieces are often not equivalent to joint authorship. For another analogy, consider per curium legal opinions. ""Per curium"" means that all of the judges or justices agreed, but it's a very different thing from all of them signing the opinion. Typically, they're less controversial cases, so one judge's clerk writes the opinion, then they're circulated for comment. But the other judges typically don't scrutinize it as closely as if their name was on the line; there are many examples of judges railing against dicta that they theoretically endorsed just a couple of years earlier—sometimes even within the same case. Unanimous opinions (where every judge signs) are different, and they reflect a higher level of collaboration, as in Brown v. Board of Education. The bottom line is that the source itself doesn't say who wrote it. The commentators on BLP/N seem to think this is an important distinction. Luke "

Im so pleased that your pleased that my message made you pleased! .

User:They call me Mr. Pibb User:Saturation2 My concern about your username Thank you for posting your message on my talkpage and for your concern regarding my username, At this point I think it will be a moot point because I am on the verge of being banned anyway by some admin a-hole who kept reverting my edits in Polar Bear even after I posted the references required. If I am not ultimately banned and can continue to edit and you would like to continue to discuss this further then please leave a message on my talk page.

Indeed scientists do think the plant evolved / developed in the cooler highlands of Africa as I have noted, but let us be more diplomatic my friend, since as you should know we will also be judged by our choice of presentation. /talk/

What a paid off PoS.

" BAD FAITH PART II I don't take kindly to implied threats like ""PLEASE LEAVE"" link title... you have not the cause or reason to say such and it could be construed that you are the ""Owner"" which would violated WP:OWN as well as WP:PA. I say to you, Propol, you leave... "

It is sourced. Look at it before jumping on conclusions. 178.73.210.178

, 3 November 2006 (UTC) The proof is in the cards: millions upon millions of Sweetest Day cards with nearly identical highly deceptive statements printed right on the back of every card. American Greetings was founded in 1906, Hallmark in 1910. Both were there for the first Sweetest Days which started in 1921. What's going on is obviously co-ordinated intentional deception in order to sell products. 22:34

edit #2: Somebody changed the date from jan. 2006 to jan. 2007 from that part of the text...

" Okay, I'm going to try and explain this to you again. There are a few points which you don't seem to be understanding, so I'm going to number them. Infoboxes contain links to various sites which contain information. For instance, an actor's infobox will often contain a link to their official web site as well as a link to their IMDb profile. These are not meant as sources or references. They are simply links to other reference type sites which are well known for their content as it relates to actors. The reason that they are included is summed up on WP:EL which states in part ""... information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail, or other meaningful, relevant content..."" IMDb and IAFD go into a great amount of detail which we don't include. This is why they are linked in the infobox. IMDb, much like IAFD, cannot be used as a source for biographical information. This is because there is little, if any, fact checking done for that information. For instance, for my IMDb profile (yes, I have one and no, I will not share it with you since it has my real name), I could supply IMDb with a date of birth, ethnicity, and so on and claim to be me but they don't actually know that I am who I say I am. The filmography on my profile though is supplied by the directors, production companies, etc. which have had me work for them on their films. Filmographies come to IMDb from official sources. IAFD works much the same. Biographical information is not very well fact checked and comes from the average user/reader/whatever you want to call them. Filmography info comes from the production companies. You keep asking me for a source. I don't have any other source than what is already supplied in the article. If you go to Bitoni's article and look at the ethnicity in the infobox, you'll see a little number ""2"" next to it. That number refers to a reference in the references section of the article. When you look there, you'll see that all the references are numbered. Click on the second reference and that is the page that is being used as a reference for her ethnicity. The ""a, b, c"" that you see there means that the same source is being used for two other facts within the article. That source is from Bitoni's publicist. It's as credible as can be and is trusted. There, now that I've explained all of this, do you have any questions? If so, please explain which point you don't understand. |(talk) "

yo i got me a gun ill shoot u

New Recording Labels and Artist

sup Thanks for the anal sex yesterday! Love, George (your homosexual lover)

Please, read references before removing them. Please, read all references before passing any judgement about their validity, possible need for new references, and do not re-phrase the existing text if it is not needed. We have to respect efforts of other editors.

timestamp to unsigned templates, so you do it for me. Thanks! ) t c 03:08, 25

" Image:Evil_sidewalk.gif listed for deletion An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Evil_sidewalk.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tex "

" I am not competent to comment on that section myself - but I think that if you feel it is imbalanced that you just go ahead and trim it, it already seems to alot undue weight to one corner of the topic that hasn't received that much attention. "

, 23 July 2006 (UTC) Thank you, will think about creating account. 19:06

i need to leave fisherQueen a message...WE'RE BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!! well only on this page.. but soon we will be after you!!!!!!!!!!!! Just kidding...maybe...you will never know! THEY are after you and your lesbian friends!!!!!! And merope, you cant call that comment pearsonal offence because it says on her user page!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TU has an article here that the budget dispute is going to court now. I didnt read the specifics though. That is really cool you got that photo! Any word on when the new City Hall/ old verizon building will be moved into? I did see a good reference on Native American settlement along the Poesten Kill to Wynants Kill area recently... just got to find where I stuck it... I seem to have been distracted by something recently.

@Taylor_Simonee you have your nips pierced too ?! 🌾👀🌾

" It might be better to go here Template_talk:Drugbox and post your problem. Maybe they can make the drug box automatically line wrap in future. | T@1k? "

I have not edited other articles because you keep changing back my changes and i'm stuck on Mccreedy!!!!! Please can you put it back how it was yesterday and then we can discuss the issues one by one.

~~I don't think the reference to Dirtbags, i.e. taking you to a paget hat has nothign to do with a movie, but a southern california softball team is anything that is worth putting on here.

Answer: You use the date July 20 of 1599 AD as Thot 1 and retreat one date back every 4 years, or 30 days back in 120 years. Example, 240 years is 60 days back to May 21 of 1839 AD, or Apr 21 of 1959 AD, then add 13 days in our 1900 or 2000 century to have Gregorian May 4 in 1959 AD. Another 44 years to 2003 AD and 11 leap days takes all the dates back to April 23. Then 2004-2007 is April 22. In reply to the post below which says the Coptic calendar is not Egyptian, the answer is our September 11 as Thot 1 is Julian August 29. Though the Coptic calendar (Egyptian with leap days) was accepted in 284 AD (which Era of Diocletion is the Era of Christian Martyrs so coincidentally the year 6000 of Adam in the Jewish book of Josephus published in Rome), this calendar leap day was created in 27 BC by Augustus Octavius Caesar who inaugurated it in 25 BC when Thoht 1 becomes August 29. Therefore, the Coptic calendar is Julian (not Gregorian). Events against America have been on Egyptian dates. The August 2 invasion of Kuwait is Julian July 20 and the invasion takes place at 30 degrees where the rise of Sothis occurs on that date only at that latitude; this implying Saddam chose the rise to invade. However, they felt world trade controlling oil was USA blame. Another date is Thoth 1 was Feb 26 in 747 BC. In 1993 the world trade was bombed on Gregorian Feb 26 not taking into account that Julian Feb 26 is March 11 (March 10 in leap year). The Coptic calendar honors this date as the half year placing Pamenot 1 on March 10 and the internet terrorists attempt to destroy world trade by constantly revising the March 10 virus.

Not flat at all I walked the length of Flat Bastion Road last weekend. Talk about misnamed! There's nothing flat about it. -)

"I just read this article for the first time yesterday and I agree that the language in this article is not encyclopedic in tone. It made me laugh out loud in several places, and it's probably not supposed to. Even if the sources use this kind of language, it is not considered the best writing practices and can be vastly improved. For example, Why would Nelson's legitimate children be singled out in a box? Why in the section titled ""Children"", would the ones sired out of wedlock not be included, as in the one he had with Georgeanne Crewe? Why actually have an entire section on his children? Why not just a paragraph? Or actually, they are mentioned in other places, so why the entire section to emphasize them? Why is Kris Nelson described as ""making love"" with Ron Reagan, but Nelson is described as ""cavorting"" with two LA Rams cheerleaders in the same paragraph? These euphemisms need to be replaced by the simplest term: ""having sex"". ""She was hell-bent on taking everything she possibly could and leaving Rick ruined."" Good gracious, this needs a quote from a biographer or something: According to biographer John Q. Gossipmonger... I agree that too much is written about Nelson's volatile relationships. I don't see how it has any bearing on his career or notability in performing. Why is it necessary to know that Blair was a cocaine-user, shoplifter, and Nelson's family disapproved of their relationship? What bearing does this have on how readers should understand why he was notable? I'm not saying the details about his various affairs should be hidden, but the article makes it seem as if, perhaps like Hugh Hefner, Ricky Nelson was *as notable* for his affairs as he was the job that made him famous. Overlooking the article, the same amount of emphasis is placed on his music career as it is placed on his personal life. Actually, somewhat less. I get the impression a relative of Nelson's has had a hand in writing this article. Perhaps a progeny who was directly involved in some of the court cases among the Nelsons and Harmons. If, in fact, the best reliable sources assert that Nelson's affairs actually were as important as his performing career, a quote about that statement should come from a very good source. I wrote Roy Orbison's article, and I understand the issue above about sources writing about the ""juicy"" parts of the subject's life. One of the biographies I used was rather determined to place undue and frankly odd emphasis on the writer's view that Orbison was a hapless underachiever who tripped into fame by accident, and the book is designed to paint him as a mediocre guy in extraordinary circumstances. Orbison's life was nowhere near as vibrantly sexual as Ricky Nelson's (an impression that is really backed up in this article), so the biographer slipped in shocking tidbits about other artists, for some reason explaining that only parts of Patsy Cline were found after her airplane accident. So what to do as a Wikipedia editor? Weed out that wtf? in the biography and stick only to the facts. "

From now on, you are dead to me.

" As I say, if you upload the images again using the above template which should look like this on the image page: then they will be safe from deletion. If you took the images yourself then I wonder whether you could claim copyright for them or if the copyright belongs to the Govt.s of the relevant countries... '''''' (talk) "

18:14, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I'm surprised I'm still at school tbh, I can be quite the retard at times. I'm either exceptional at a subject or absolute shiteee.

" You're a complete moron for claiming such comparison made is ""pointless and unsourced"". I merely expanded on a comparison made on the diamond page and importing the graph from that page. If you are a consistent anal retentive, then you should also remove that comparison as well. But we both know you're a fool! Furthermore, the comparison made between graphite and diamond is made in geology classes around the world. Why do you feel that your ignorance is a merit for judgment?"

Like Athenian Generals that were both Athenian and Greek.... Spartan Generals that were Spartan and Greek..... etc... Ptolemy was Macedonian and Greek.

" Therein lies the heart of our disagreement, albeit on a collateral issue. You now claim to have asked me ""those questions before and they were ignored."" Your statement is false. You posted one message on this page to me before. It asked me no question. Read it. It’s on this page. In your next post to me, you make the posting of your FIRST question ever to me start out with “Again, what are you talking about when you say you've been blocked?” You can’t ask me anything starting with “Again, what” in that condescending tone, when you’ve never asked me anything before. It’s horribly disrespectful. But let me say again, let us focus on Chowbok’s questions. You have not answered them. You say again that you have. I’ve reviewed the discussions in the archives and on the current discussion page. You have not answered what Chowbok has asked. No one has. If there are particular answers or statement you see there that answer what Chowbok has asked for with s-p-e-c-i-f-i-c-a-t-i-o-n, please cut and paste the information here. I’ve read every word. I am not alone in not seeing it. Please look at what he has asked. It is clear. I do not want to have needless discussion about the question. If you understand it, please answer it. If you find that the question is not clear to you, tell him what is confusing to you and ask him for clarification. Let’s stay on topic. Yes, it would all be simplier if we (aka ""us people"") stopped speaking up, much in the same way that if Civil Rights advocates stopped talking and let things stay in The Natural Order Of Things, it would all be ""simplier."""

I don't know about the Daily Mirror, but the Daily Mail is a reliable source—or at least, the last time Wikipedia debated the matter at WP:RSN, the consensus was that it is reliable (I listed it as such despite my personal disagreement as to its reliability). —

I think that that is the point. Had I been blocked by anyone else it would actually mean something. But having the town's rogue cop giving you the once over is just unremarkable.

Can you cunts go 20 seconds without talking about weed

"Also, where is this so called ""consensus"" on the word ""abducted"" that I keep reading about?"

Not necessarily appendant.... It requires Shrine membership, not Blue Lodge membership, and does not necessarily have a wide enough existence to warrant the appellation.

Stuff You've got to stop blanking. You've been warned several times. I get administrators involved next. Also... Thanks!

Creating, and Maintaining Articles/Creating a New Article]]

These old hoes is madddd that @DrayaFace and @MalaysiaPargo slayed they attire!!! BasketballWivesLA DrayaMondays

2007 (UTC) actually the Hotaks were firstly mentioned as first Afghans 200 years later ...so till those days they were or became just a sub-group of Ghalzais. Like Awghans today want to claim the whole history of pre-afghanistani time for themself we have the same problem with the Hotaks who count today to Ghalzais so they are today de facto Ghalzais and everyone recognize them as such one...also scienists! The Ghalzais self are also not Pashtuns/Awghans since they are Khaljis..but today they count to Pashtuns. 17:48, 18 October

November 2012 Ignoring WP:NOR is a breach of WP:CONLIMITED. Replacing well cited contend with OR is a breach of WP:NOR. So undoing my edits is a breach of WP:CONLIMITED.

Pictures of notable Puerto Ricans in info box For the sample photos of notable Puerto Ricans in the info box, Why do you guys intend on putting the whitest-looking Puerto Ricans up there??? As if there are no mixed-looking Puerto Ricans or Afro-Puerto Ricans who are notable, famous, and worthy of recognition.

Dear Blade, I have cleaned up the old inscriptions (upto 11-12 AR inscriptions from the article. Please remember that earlier also I have cleaned few of them already, but Mr. Sitush has reverted them back due to unknown reasons. I have read of WP citation rules. Almost all remaining citations are from Historical books dated between 1969 to 2002. I just want to remind you most of famous historical research books are between 1980 to 2000. There will be hardly one or two books from this millenium. I agree with Mr. Sitush about cleaning up content which relies on Dubious content and welcome it and I will also contribute in that. at the same time there should be any double standards in doing so, like Mr Sitush is citing some unknown books and writing statements to hurt Rajus community and at the same time removing imp citations of Books by authors like Yashoda Devi. I Request Mr. Sitush to apply the same rules for his community [Kamma_(caste)] and remove the dubious citations from it as it is full of dubious content than the remaining telugu castes. When one follows constructive role everyone will automatically join follow the contrsuctive method.

" Oregon Ducks football Hi Abdoozy, sorry for not responding sooner. I've been in somewhat of a hiatus and didn't see your message until today when I went to update the Oregon Ducks track and field page with the recent women's indoor title. I blazed through the article really quick and it looks much better. Some of the ""eyesores"" have been eliminated and it's in general, much cleaner that it was before. I'll take a look at it in more detail when I have the time. Let me know if you're still interested in pushing it toward GA. Nice work thus far! "

Deletion of The Sunday Times Travel Magazine Hi Pam Thanks for your New User guidelines. Much appreciated. I tried to make it clear that I was a staffer on the magazine, but will do the extra bits you've suggested. HOWEVER, I can't do that until it is reinstated. I tried to write the page as independently as possible, with no fluff or marketing speak, but it was still deleted by despite the fact that ALL of our competitor titles have pages. Do you know how I can get it reinstated? Then I can make the changes you've suggested. Otherwise, do you know if Wikipedia / will be removing all competitor pages, too? Any advice gratefully received. Cheers Jill jillsg

Mom you've been a real bitch lately

Archive Is this discussion page getting long enough for another archive?

Hi ho, hi ho, it's off to work we go! It's MilitaryMonday...support a military organization today.

"Thank you for experimenting with the page Larry Ellison on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. (t • c • [ log]) "